Scholastic found that it either had to give in to the hardliners who wanted to ban books for children or to not allow that, and they seem to have decided to give in.

  • ArthurOPA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    They could have at least made this “controversial” collection of books opt-out instead of opt-in.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Opt in makes it less likely a teacher orders it by accident. And they called it things like “stories of inclusivity”. It’s pretty on the nose that they support these books and are calling out those who wouldn’t as being “uninclusive”.

        • ArthurOPA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This situation is just so sad.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Just because they’re outraged doesn’t make them right. Idiots get outraged all the time about things they don’t understand. Ask yourself, who is legislating these changes? It’s not Scholastic. So why are you acting like they’re the ones pushing for this? And ignoring that they didn’t call them “banned naughty books”. They’re called “books on inclusivity”. You just want to be outraged instead of thinking it through. Pretty sad on a community about books.

          • ArthurOPA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you read the article further than the title? It’s just a bunch of quotes from people going through the new process. The title is egregious but the content is helpful in understanding why teachers/school admin are frustrated.