Scholastic found that it either had to give in to the hardliners who wanted to ban books for children or to not allow that, and they seem to have decided to give in.

  • fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Opt in makes it less likely a teacher orders it by accident. And they called it things like “stories of inclusivity”. It’s pretty on the nose that they support these books and are calling out those who wouldn’t as being “uninclusive”.

      • ArthurOPA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This situation is just so sad.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just because they’re outraged doesn’t make them right. Idiots get outraged all the time about things they don’t understand. Ask yourself, who is legislating these changes? It’s not Scholastic. So why are you acting like they’re the ones pushing for this? And ignoring that they didn’t call them “banned naughty books”. They’re called “books on inclusivity”. You just want to be outraged instead of thinking it through. Pretty sad on a community about books.

        • ArthurOPA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did you read the article further than the title? It’s just a bunch of quotes from people going through the new process. The title is egregious but the content is helpful in understanding why teachers/school admin are frustrated.