They believe they have a God given right to break the speed limit

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    These cameras disproportionately impact working class individuals, …

    100% true, unless fines are scaled to be proportional with offender wealth.

    • healthetank@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Even then, I’d argue they still disproportionately impact those most likely to be on the road - those who need to drive for or to work.

      But so what? Drive the speed limit and you don’t get ticketed. This isn’t some unfair cop picking and choosing who to pull over. Add scaling fines for income and its STILL going to disproportionally impact working class people.

      Its still not an argument to get rid of them

    • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      So let’s push for that instead of pushing to remove cameras. In fact, proportional fines would probably increase the revenue, which would bring the funds to improve the road design so folks don’t get the wrong impression of the speed they’re supposed to be in. Also let’s push for better transit so poor people are not forced to drive and risk getting fined.

      • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        While I’m down for eating the billionaires, this sounds awfully close to punishing people for being successful.

        I agree it disproportionally affects poor people, but rather than scaling the punishment, maybe the answer is to look for non punitive measures that produce the same result.

        • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’m in agreement that we need systemic solutions, and those involve improving road design, so we agree for the most part on the most important aspect of this.

          punishing people for being successful.

          But issuing bigger fines for breaking the law is very, VERY far from punishing people for being successful. It’s a correction of an unfortunate truth: if you’re wealthy, you can afford to drive recklessly.

          • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Unscaled fines punish people for being poor, because the punishment is a larger percentage of their disposable income.

            Why should a poor person pay a fine of 30% of their monthly take home, while a rich enough person pays 5% (or less?) of their take home for the same infraction.

            The only fair solution is for the fine to amount to an equal percent of your take home pay. Then it is the same punishment for everyone.

            • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Indeed I don’t disagree, I think it’s worth experimenting with this and driving fines look like a good place to start

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      They disproportionately effect assholes who speed. The fines are harder to pay if you are poor but they are equally easy to avoid for both rich and poor.