I’ve seen some sites/programs mentioned before for this, but thought it may be good to have a solid list.

What tools do we have today to identify slop, whether it’s video, audio, text etc.? I know right now most of us can identify it just because it’s off or feels wrong in some way, but we are going to need better tools in the future to be able to truly tell. Also bonus if it’s an offline tool.

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m dyslexic, have ADHD and basically can’t read. Is it terrible that I use Ai to make me seem more capable when I need to write things?

    • ZDL@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      No. There are legitimate use cases for LLMbeciles, and as long as you are wary of hallucination yours is a perfectly cromulent case. Another case is, again providing you check for delusion, translation. LLMs are far superior to whatever tech Google Translate, Baidu Translate, et al use when performing translation. As long as you double-check that you didn’t get hit by an LLM hallucination.

    • truxnell@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Not at all, there are valid uses for LLMs and I take this community with a gain of salt. I think a lot of us passionately hate the hype narrative and useless uses for the tech, but it doesn’t mean that every single use of it is inherently bad.

      The biggest thing if worry about might be the risk of it giving/outputting misleading information if it’s easy for you to sense check it.

  • ZDL@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Develop a taste only for art whose origin can be definitively proved to predate 2000. Eschew all art whose creation date has four digits and starts with a 2.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    As soon as you have a public tool to do this, bad actors will use that tool to fine tune models and evade it.

    • ZDL@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’d love to see the tool used to fine tune a model based on “read, look at, and watch only stuff made pre-2000”.

      It’d be one Hell of a tool that incorporates time travel!

  • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I believe the market will sort this out. AI slop will only stay relevant in the domain of scammers and spammers, where demand doesn’t count.

  • Victoria@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know of a tool to reliably identify AI works. Usually I resort to a vibe check, and if I’m not sure, I check the rest of the profile.