• latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yep. Popularity hasn’t yet died down, but having a bunch of closed-minded “anti-woke” (i.e. Fascists) people dogpiling onto 40k as though they’re begging to be Servitorised in the service of the Emp’rah is… dismaying, to say the least.

    Worst part is, one can’t even have a conversation with such fans, as they instantly shoot down any and all subjects which they deem even marginally related to “woke stuff,” sometimes with disturbing zeal. How such an obvious satirical dystopia can be misinterpreted in such a way is beyond me…

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Some people are just really passionate about their tiny yellow plastic toy soldiers all having imaginary penises. The penises are important to them. They can’t bear to imagine a Legio Custodes that doesn’t have a full armament of cock.

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        This is why I either went with Chaos (during my adolescence, mostly outgrew them) or Aeldari. I mean, they aren’t that much better from a lore perspective, but at least they give everyone a chance to suffer equally…

        • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          What I also appreciate about Chaos is that their writers know they’re evil. I swear the people writing loyalist books forget that the Imperium is basically as bad as the rest in its own way.

          • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            Very much, yes! Chaos is the clearest, most stable faction in the entire lore in terms of characterisation and intent!

            Honestly, I think the ambiguity behind the Imperium’s portrayal stems from a sort of pandering to the popularity of the faction itself, maybe even to blunt the sharpness a bit, make it more accessible to new inductees. Easier to sell a “slightly Theo-Fascistic” galactic empire than “we need to sacrifice literally thousands of people marked as Other to a corpse and, yes, corpse starch is exactly what it says on the tin. Oh, and we’ll need to lobotomise about 10000 of you because our biotoxin planet-wiping nukes need polishing.”

            It’s a pity, because that’s exactly what drew me into 40k to begin with, that feeling of “wow, this stuff’s beyond horrific, my morbid curiosity is tickled seventy shades of pink!”

        • Mîm@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          lore

          Let me interject with my unasked opinion:
          Aa far as I’m concerned the trouble started when we stopped calling it fluff and started calling it lore (and treating it with such reverance) instead.

          • rtxn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            And Tolkien’s Legendarium is just a bunch of hastily-written bedtime stories for Chris, right?

          • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Oh, no, with literally hundreds of books’ worth of backstory beyond all of the “your headcanon is valid” bits, we are well and truly beyond simple fluff.

            Fluff is those 3 paragraphs of contextual flavour text you get on the back of a board game box.