There is a hunger for bold, transformative politics in the United States right now. Zohran Mamdani shows how the Left can run on a principled, disciplined message that speaks to voters’ lived concerns — and win.
Yea, their really shitty or barely mediocre mayors? This is very different from times before and I think it’s ok to be excited. If it does end up going wrong you need to know that being a massive pessimist just for the sake of the world’s most depressing “win” is not a healthy way to live. Plus, nothing is really pointing to this being a bad thing except your own evident misunderstanding of the situation.
I wish him all the best, and more than anything I hope that the federal government doesn’t sabotage him and I hope that even if they do people will be able to understand that instead of going “wow he failed! No I’m not going to think about it harder than that.”
Literally these things have already been done with success. Your ignorance is not the definition of reality.
We know for a fact that housing people, keeping rent under control, and even offering free public transport all lead to a stronger economy and far better financial security for the 99%(which is even good for the 1% because it means people can actually buy their shit). This isn’t wishful thinking, it’s been tried in better places and the US is a perfect case study on why the centrist and right-wing ideas don’t work and have never worked.
You’re not a cynic, you’re poorly informed about the subject.
I’m not doubting all that stuff is great if Mamdami can make it happen. I’m skeptical that he can make it happen, based on having seen this kind of thing before. Heck, he hasn’t even won the mayoral election yet. I’d give him 50% chance of becoming mayor, based on remembering Lieberman for Connecticut. As for the other stuff, it’s all vague enough to make it easy to claim victory, at least based on what you’ve posted here. So I’d want to see definite success criteria based on measurable results.
Yea, their really shitty or barely mediocre mayors? This is very different from times before and I think it’s ok to be excited. If it does end up going wrong you need to know that being a massive pessimist just for the sake of the world’s most depressing “win” is not a healthy way to live. Plus, nothing is really pointing to this being a bad thing except your own evident misunderstanding of the situation.
I wish him all the best, and more than anything I hope that the federal government doesn’t sabotage him and I hope that even if they do people will be able to understand that instead of going “wow he failed! No I’m not going to think about it harder than that.”
Healthy cynicism my friend ;).
I see a bunch of idealistic goals that don’t look likely to survive contact with reality. But, like you, I wish him all the best as well.
Is the Green New Deal still around by the way? Same issue, more or less.
Literally these things have already been done with success. Your ignorance is not the definition of reality.
We know for a fact that housing people, keeping rent under control, and even offering free public transport all lead to a stronger economy and far better financial security for the 99%(which is even good for the 1% because it means people can actually buy their shit). This isn’t wishful thinking, it’s been tried in better places and the US is a perfect case study on why the centrist and right-wing ideas don’t work and have never worked.
You’re not a cynic, you’re poorly informed about the subject.
I’m not doubting all that stuff is great if Mamdami can make it happen. I’m skeptical that he can make it happen, based on having seen this kind of thing before. Heck, he hasn’t even won the mayoral election yet. I’d give him 50% chance of becoming mayor, based on remembering Lieberman for Connecticut. As for the other stuff, it’s all vague enough to make it easy to claim victory, at least based on what you’ve posted here. So I’d want to see definite success criteria based on measurable results.