• ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        All animals, us included, are food for other animals, and plants.

        That’s what is called an “ecosystem”.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          “I was walking along the bank of a stream when I saw a mother otter with her cubs, a very endearing sight, I’m sure you’ll agree. And even as I watched, the mother otter dived into the water and came up with a plump salmon, which she subdued and dragged onto a half submerged log. As she ate it, while of course it was still alive, the body split and I remember to this day the sweet pinkness of its roes as they spilled out, much to the delight of the baby otters, who scrambled over themselves to feed on the delicacy. One of nature’s wonders, gentlemen. Mother and children dining upon mother and children. And that is when I first learned about evil. It is built into the very nature of the universe. Every world spins in pain. If there is any kind of supreme being, I told myself, it is up to all of us to become his moral superior.”

          -Terry Pratchett, Unseen Academicals

            • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              But on a serious note, how good is venison? Fucking delicious. You ever make chili with it? Goddamn backstrap chili. Like eating heaven.

            • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I only eat meat that consents. Anybody want to come over for dinner? Coincidentally, you’ll have to sign a waiver.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            this depends on where you live, surely. i have open field farms all around me that cooperatively own a slaughterhouse. they sell meat in stores under one brand but you can go to any of the farms and get it directly.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        All food is cruel. You can, at most, minimize the cruelty.

        But you should know that millions of insects are killed in agriculture. Insects are indeed animals.

        You can, if you want, minimize the amount of animals your presence in this world brings to an early death. But you cannot reduce it to zero no even near zero. Probably hundreds of small animals (most insects but surely many other small animals) die each day because things you do.

        The line on how much do you want to minimize might be on one place for you, and that’s ok. But you have to respect other people lines as well.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          This…plants feel pain. Mushrooms may actually be sentient. Everyone draws their own lines, it doesn’t make them better or worse.

          • o1011o@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            51 minutes ago

            There is overwhelming scientific evidence that animals feel pain and are sentient like us, and despite the pop science articles to the contrary there is no scientific evidence that plants feel pain or have sentience at all. Plants respond to stimulus in very complicated ways, that’s what we have evidence for. Don’t pretend the two are equivalent. Stop getting your ideas from sensationalist pop science garbage and read the actual studies.

        • 9blb@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          There’s a difference between actively choosing to kill an animal, and having an animal die as a consequence of another action.

          Driving a car means that you’ll inevitably hit an animal at some point, but the alternative (walking) is often impractical and you’ll still try your best and stop or swerve when a cat runs into the road.

          Eating meat, on the other hand, is an active choice that always involves someone killing an animal. The alternative is always there and is as easy as can be: eat something else.

          But you have to respect other people lines as well.

          Your personal freedom stops where someone else’s freedom begins. The question is whether you consider animals to be someone or something.

          • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            The fact that you don’t see the bugs being killed in the agricultural process do not mean they do not die because of your choosing. Killing bugs is a necessary part of the making of all the food you eat. It’s not an “accident” or “undeliberated”. The word “pesticide” for instance should give you a hint. Also a lot of the cleaning process of any vegetable is meant, among other things, to get rid of any bugs present.

            You also, presumably, live in a house, what do you think that happened with the thousands of bugs that used to live in that plot of land. They didn’t die by accident, they died because you wanted a cozy house instead of sleeping on the grass. The clothes you wear, all consumer products you use, your phone. Millions of bug deaths could be prevented if you decided to live caveman style. If they die is your choosing. And everyone else respect that choice. Respect yourself other people choices that imply a small margin more of animal deaths.

            • 9blb@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I’m very well aware of the impact my existence has on the planet, but I can still try and minimize that impact as much as possible, even without taking it to the extreme and ending society. It’s not all or nothing.

              If you want to minimize the amount of bugs killed, not eating meat is a great way to achieve that. Instead of harvesting tons of crops to then feed to animals, you could just eat those crops yourself. You’d even end up needing less space to grow your food overall, meaning you could re-naturalize a lot of farmland and create a habitat for billions of insects.

              Respect yourself other people choices

              How about you respect other animals right to bodily integrity.

              • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                You pit your line respecting animals body integrity at one particular position. As you have already recognized.

                Respect that other people’s position of that line are different. At the end of the day you kill 1000 animals a day, eating meat I might kill 1050 animals a day. Not that much of a difference so… Just respect, it’s not that hard not to try enforce your way of life in others for such a small difference in animal deaths. Who knows maybe due your other habits you end up killing more animals than me. Do you do international travel by any chance? Do you drive cars or mount on motorized vehicles daily?

                Be aware and prepare to be heavily judged by others if you pretend to judge people on those basis.

                At the end we should just make a throughout body count of animals killed, including insects, you’ll probably be surprised by the results.

                Or, much easier option, just respect that other people eat meat. And don’t try to enforce your traditions on others.

            • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I agree! so we should try to get locally grown food without pesticides and then people can stop coping. Somehow my family manages to grow food without it and if there’s a bug we just dust it off into the grass. People who freak out over a little bug or fruit that’s not totally perfect are actually part of the problem.

              It’s pure cope to say “I can’t avoid causing suffering so me making a deliberate choice to cause MORE suffering to animals that are the same intelligence as my dog is actually fine.”

              • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                It’s just using logic to destroy some common militant-radical-vegan arguments.

                These people kill thousands of animals each years. And get angry that you kill a thousand and one.

                They get angry that you say that human beings are more important than cows. But then they act as cows are more important than ants.

                At the end that line of thinking is approaching religion levels of dogmatism. Thus why I feel compelled to rebate some arguments.

                Your history for instance doesn’t really hold up. A little home leisure grows doesn’t provide for a family. To provide food for humans you do need proper agriculture, and proper agriculture, even traditional one, means the destruction of animal habitats and their massive killing.

                If you don’t want to eat animals, specially the bigger ones because you feel sorry for them that’s ok. I would never question your personal choices. But if you start trying to enforce your personal choices on me, and start trying to moral shame me in a religious sort of way, then is when I have to push back. I already had my cup of religious moral shaming on catholic school, I don’t need more of it.

                There’s nothing inmoral about eating meat. And not eating meat doesn’t make anyone a better person.

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            There’s a difference between actively choosing to kill an animal, and having an animal die as a consequence of another action.

            It’s semi-related but this meme comes to my mind:

            and also this one:

            sorry for the poor quality of the second one, i couldn’t find a version with more pixels.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If that were true, we wouldn’t be able to digest them. Ever tried eating a tree? Or a boulder? Those aren’t food for humans. I’m not gonna argue against moral motivations for veganism, but I will argue against factually incorrect ones.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yes they are. They have been for eons. It’s not all they are and people should work towards meatless options and ethical meat like lab grown. But animals are definitely a food source.

        • AlreadyDefederated@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Have you tried some good alternatives to meat? Like, try seitan* crumbles in a taco. With all the spices and other toppings it’s really hard to tell the difference. Also, I find it almost impossible to tell an Impossible Whopper with Cheese from a regular Whopper with Cheese, after all the glop they put on it. I know those are both bottom-of-the-barrel meat choices, but maybe branch out and try a thing or two. If you don’t like it - no biggie.

          I’ve tried casually dipping my toes into the vegetarian pool with just occasional meat substitutions. Occasionally I find something that’s “No way” but more often than not, I find something that is also really tasty. It’s not meat, but it’s also tasty in a different way, so I don’t miss meat as much. I’ve found vegetarian dishes I actually like. My biggest problem however is getting enough protein in my diet when I start eating mostly veggies.

          [* Seitan only if you can handle gluten. Because, it’s like 100% gluten! ]

          • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Meat alternatives are a nice thought. I’m glad they exist for people who can accept them in place of meat. I haven’t found them to be very good substitutes yet so I’m not there. I’ve had the impossible whopper, and while it’s good, it’s not a replacement for me. Hopefully more options come over the years. I’m hopeful for lab grown meat personally since it’d still be meat, just ethically produced.

            • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              It’s crazy that people don’t like meat substitutes, but if you tell them it’s not a meat substitute, but actually a special cow from nepal with a different taste, it’s suddenly good and exotic. I hate it when it doesn’t taste like animal suffering.