• cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not an either/or situation.

    In the (supposed) words of Al Capone

    You get a lot more from a kind word and a gun than from a kind word alone.

    Critically however, a gun without the kind word is also far less effective. They are like the tip and shaft of a spear. The shaft has the range, but lacks the punch. The tip has the punch, but lacks the range. Together they are far more than the sum of their parts.

    In terms of protest. A peaceful protest is like the kind word. It’s a polite but forceful delivery of a message. Radical action and violence are the gun. They work best as an implied threat. The target much know that you are willing to escalate, if required.

    Too much violence, and you have a riot. These can be put down with force, and have little to no public backlash. (This is what trump currently wants to happen).

    Too little violence, and the protest can be safely ignored.

    The perfect balance has enough to keep the government on their toes, but not so much as to drive away supporters, and burn off the anger powering things.

    Currently, Trump and co are trying to goad people into over reacting and justifying an aggressive crackdown. In light of that, a message of don’t take the bait, err towards passive over violence isn’t so bad.