• zephyreks@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then… Disprove it? If there’s such distinct evidence that counters the article, might as well use it in your argument lol

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not how the burden of proof goes. The article is making a claim. It’s on the article’s authors to prove it.

        • Melpomene@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not that you haven’t had this explained to you repeatedly, but… thats not how the burden of proof works.

          Example:

          If I say “zephyreks is an unrepentant kisser of billionaire toes,” then I should be the one to provide proof of toe kissing. It’s not on you to prove that you don’t kiss billionaire toes.

          In the article, the author makes a claim. They do not back up the claim with evidence. They dong do so, they should expect to be criticized for it.

      • zephyreks@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do I need to? I haven’t had a visceral reaction to the article.

        For what it’s worth, China’s affirmative action policies for minority groups put the US to shame. Significantly easier college admissions (despite using a standardized process), extremely generous business loans, proportional ethnic representation in government, vast infrastructure projects to bridge the salary gap, and celebrations of different cultures across the country. Not very capitalist of them, given that these infrastructure projects (while very beneficial to the endpoints) are not profitable.

        • Gamma@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Nobody else has had a visceral reaction, we’ve just pointed out bad journalism 🙂 Using big negative words might make you feel better, but it doesn’t make them accurate. You’re using them to be dismissive of our points

        • cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          Treating minorities better than the USA isn’t exactly a high bar.

          My country also treats minorities better than the USA, it’s easy to get into uni, celebrates diversity, has an alright social welfare system and socialised healthcare, does the occasional infrastructure project etc.

          Thanks for teaching me that I’m actually living in a socialist paradise rather than a poor, neoliberal capitalist, physically isolated island where private corporations are free to wreck the environment for profit!

        • SugarApplePie@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Significantly easier college admissions (despite using a standardized process), extremely generous business loans, proportional ethnic representation in government, vast infrastructure projects to bridge the salary gap, and celebrations of different cultures across the country. Not very capitalist of them

          Sorry OP but basically none of this has anything to do with not being capitalist. I don’t even doubt that China is doing better in those departments than America, but that has more to do with how utterly shit America is at most things outside of building bombs than how communist China is. They should get some kudos for executing a couple billionaires, though, gotta at least give 'em that.