• OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m confused about Gmail listed as a search engine. Google is the search engine, as I understand it, and Gmail is a mail client. Or you could put Alphabet I guess.

  • Novocirab@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Someone commented on a repost of this guide: “Missing stract.com, it’s like old school google before the ads. A little slow to update to latest web crawl, but much better content returned”

  • I like this graphic format you’re using. The information is presented clearly and succinctly; as a summary graphic, it’s quite nice that you limit the information density. Viewers can use it as a jumping off point for further research.

    If you designed this yourself, kudos.

    • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Thanks! Exactly the balance I am trying to achieve. There are a lot of in-depth guides, but they can be overwhelming to the average person.

  • Igilq@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Note: kagi has also 100 limited search queries and to get more you have to pay

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is a huge thing to note. Kagi works well but if you set it as your default search engine and use the internet like a normal person that goes online a lot you’ll burn through 100 searches in like 2 days. 300 searches is $5 and unlimited is $10 iirc, though it’s less if you pay yearly. It also includes ai stuff

      I just use a combo of mojeek and ecosia. Mojeek is more private. Ecosia is privacy oriented but searches are still passed to microsoft, though with most (but not all) identifiers stripped out

      • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I do note that Kagi is paid, but could have made it more prominent. The free version isn’t enough to use as your default search engine.

  • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    It was hard to keep this guide light on text with all the specifics that need to be covered. Feedback is always welcome!

  • rirus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    DDG has a shady founder. They also build their own index tough.

    Qwant has a problematic owner and had a significant privacy issue.

  • sunth1ef@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    As always, these guides are highly valuable and easy to understand!

    I found a search string that cycles through available public instances of SearXNG. It has been an awesome experience

    I’m planning to experiment with my own instance soon

  • pezhore@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This was helpful, but I wonder if years a way to indicate where some of the engines primarily source their results? Duckduckgo uses Bing by default (although you can search with Google via the !g prefix), I’m not sure about the others?

  • trungulox@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    You should have added an “is absolutely worthless” border around everything there.

    Good job though. Like, not your fault search is broken.

    • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Have to disagree there. Kagi is an excellent alternative and it’s own index is getting better by the day. Qwant is also becoming a more prominent player and looks to be getting more support from EU

      • trungulox@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Doesn’t want just use googles index?

        and fair play about kagi. Like, it’s usable and frequently actually works, which is more than I can say for everything else. It’s still not where a usable search engine should be but it doesn’t happen overnight and is the diamond in an otherwise repugnant turd.