have access to labor unions and workplace protections…

And Swedish sex workers don’t. I rest my case.

Earlier you criticized that i provided a source discussion the situation multiple years ago. Now you provide a source that is from the same time and does not address nor distinguish between analog and digital.

It explains, in detail, how the Swedish model hurts sex workers. The Swedish model didn’t change so it’s still up to date.

It also goes into detail, and that is something you should really have a look at, how SWERFs systematically deny and undermine the agency of sex workers. For SWERFs it is not possible to choose, out of your own free will, to be a sex worker, so all are victims so all must be ignored if they’re saying that sex work should be legal and regulated so they can have a safe working environment.

There is a fundamental difference between digital and analog. So the criticism needs to distinguish between these two. You gave the example of street workers yourself.

I wasn’t talking about digital at all but reacted to the claim that Germany wouldn’t give a fuck about human trafficking.

So… you’re saying that Sweden should completely outlaw porn? At least the procurement of it? Because that’d be the equivalent of what they’re doing in the analog space. Then the only people left producing porn would be criminal organisations and I don’t think they care much about being kind to the workers.

Prohibition never works when there’s demand. It just doesn’t, never has, never will, not with alcohol, not with cannabis, not with porn, not with prostitution. Regulation does work.

And just for the record Sweden is just as prudish when it comes to alcohol and cannabis. All they know is abolitionism, and bringing up anything else is politically impossible.