• kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Basically:

    Intel, AMD, and Microsoft are all going down a dead-end road called x86_64, especially on portable devices.

    Apple and Google took a turn ages ago, towards an alternative called aarch64. Originally just for phones, but now for everything.

    VR headsets, Raspberry Pis, IoT devices, etc. also tend to run aarch or aarch64.

    Microsoft has been trying to follow suit, but it hasn’t gone well so far. Windows for ARM (the aarch64 version of Windows) is supremely unpopular, for a lot of (mostly good) reasons.

    So people avoid the devices or ditch them because none of their apps run natively. But Microsoft basically has no choice but to keep pushing.

    So the end result is, Microsoft is subsidizing tons of excellent hardware that will never be used for Windows cuz it’s just not ready yet.

    But Linux is!

    Edit:

    Funny thing is, ARM (company behind aarch64) keeps shooting themselves in the foot, to the point where lots of companies are hedging their bets with a dark horse called RISC-V that never had a snowball’s chance in Hell before, but now could possibly win.

    And if Microsoft still hasn’t built a new home on aarch64 by the time that happens, they may accidentally be in the best position to capitalize on it.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      RiscV to CPU is what Linux is to OS

      It will win in the end because closed source corpo trash will always enshitify and erode its market position. Just like micro-shit is the best marketer for Linux