• Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I just point blank don’t believe he did it.

    Let’s say I kill a high profile individual on the street you know, hypothetically.

    Do you seriously believe that I’d be casually hanging out in public at a McDonalds with a manifesto and loaded gun in my bag? I’m pretty sure that my first port of call if I was assassinating someone would be “Burn all the evidence in an alleyway somewhere, get new clothes on, and lay low for pretty much the rest of my fucking life, possibly in Mexico”

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      "Burn all the evidence in an alleyway somewhere, get new clothes on

      Luigi in the released CCTV photography is already wearing different clothes to the shooter. Not very different though.

      Bit strange to change clothes and backpack but keep the same styling and colors.

    • ziggurat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not only that, Luigi’s fake ID which he did not use in an illegal way any known time was not linked with the shooting, just linked to a NY hostel.

      Also Luigi was not marandised, hes also charged in NY, Pennsylvania and federally at the same time, double (triple?) jeopardy

      And his bags were searched without him being able to see the search, which puts into question the search, but they didn’t find any gun or manifesto at that time. 6 hours later, they did find a gun and a manifesto after being contact with NYPD. And the paper work for this evidence is also not properly filed. In addition the inventory of his belonging was also not descriptive.

      He was arrested by a rookie cop that didn’t get help from a supervisor to avoid mistakes either, lots of adrenaline in a huge profile case like this. He said he knew right away that this was the killer, and he had only the propaganda NYPD had posted to the media. And NYPD didn’t know who the killer was

      I dont know how long it took, but it took well over 100 days before the defence was able to even see the evidence against him. A huge red flag that the prosecution dont think the evidence holds water. And when they did get it, it was terabytes of data, and Luigi wasn’t allowed to use a computer without hus lawyer present, blocking him from seeing what weaksauce they have against him

      The aid to the prosecutor also listened in, they say it was an accident to a whole telephone conversation with Luigi and the lawyer, how is this even possible. The prosecutor rebuked him self from the case after they were caught doing this, so they do a new prosecutor

      The feds even call for the death penalty before Luigi is even indited, let alone convinced.

      I’m just very skeptical this is the shooter, why would they screw up everything so bad every step on puropuse like this. Its just a hail Mary that the judge who is married to a CEO will convict anyway

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, the real shooter is probably in the woods somewhere barely surviving off what they can find. At least, that’s more reasonable than doing a high profile assassination and going to McDonalds for a burger after (I know it was days later, it’s hyperbole).