• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    On 3rd down (out of field goal range) if your choices are dump it down for a short gain and no first, or hold it and risk getting sacked but have the opportunity at a big play the penalty for the sack is not that high. Punting from your 40 vs your 30 doesn’t change much, NFL punters can all punt over 65 yards.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      NFL punters don’t average anywhere close to 65 yards. Even if they did, coverage usually can’t cover that much distance that quickly. Long punts usually equal long returns. So 10 yd will absolutely make a difference. You just described a situation in which it would be a stupid sack to take. You’d be sacrificing field position. Not to mention the injury risk and wear and tear build up on your quarterback. You’re using a video game logic.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Average isn’t the metric to use, punters don’t try to kick it their farthest every punt, most punts are within a punters range.

        10 yards of field position is worth a chance at a big play.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          And why pray tell do they not try to kick it the furthest every punt?

          10 yards of field position could be the difference between winning and losing.