• federal reverse@feddit.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    While I agree that energy-intensive businesses should always be pushed onto flexible-pricing contracts, as a private consumer, uniform pricing is an advantage imo. You don’t need to think about whether running the washing machine will cost you 0.2¤ or 0.6¤ or whether there’s a price surge, and it’s even more expensive.

    Keeping renewables a good investment also has its merits, in terms of hopefully higher buildout speed. Albeit, the most cash-focused investors aren’t necessarily the kinds of high-minded people you’d want on those projects; which in turn may create public anger at e.g. new wind farms. And in purely monetary terms, this is also primarily benefitting the rich at the expense of the poor.

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      While I agree that energy-intensive business should always be pushed onto flexible-pricinv contracts, as a private consumer, uniform pricing is an advantage imo. You don’t need to think about whether running the washing machine will cost you 0.2¤ or 0.6¤ or whether there’s a price surge, and it’s even more expensive.

      Fixed pricing happens in Europe too. The retailer prices the volatility into a fixed pricing plan. It still ends up much cheaper than how the UK has structured their grid, which ensures electricity companies are making massive piles of money.