• then_three_more@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Something familiar

    Something peculiar

    Something for everyone—a comedy tonight!

    Something appealing

    Something appalling

    Something for everyone—a comedy tonight!

    Nothing with kings

    Nothing with crowns;

    Bring on the lovers, liars and clowns

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Which bit of history does this represent?

    At first I thought it might be the break up of the USSR, but that doesn’t really work here. So that leaves me at a loss.

    I just can’t see how Gorbachev and Trump, or their actions, are similar.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Listened to a podcast with a person who lived in the ussr when it fell and was comparing it to current day America. Basically they were saying that people are becoming more cynical and don’t really believe in the project any more and are waiting for something to come along and fundamentally change things.

      With gorbachev it was a turn to democratic liberal capitalism, with trump its a turn to autocratic neo-mercantalism.

      Both could bring down the great empires of the twentieth century.

      • Denjin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The idea is called Hypernormalisation. Everyone knows what they’re being told is a lie, most don’t care, some do but a powerless to do anything about it, the rest are actively perpetuating the lie.

        Excellent documentary about it by Adam Curtis which is watchable here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr7T07WfIhM

      • aizakku@waterloolemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        trump its a turn to autocratic neo-mercantalism.

        Yea there’s that, also the rounding up minorities for a nationalistic reason… if only the English language offered some word for that. Squashing undesirables/enemies due to nationalism with rhetoric like them poisoning the blood, being vermin, etc. I seem to recall a history lesson or two if only I could remember. I feel it’s some odd word no one knows how to use anymore, I think it rhymes with plascism.

    • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I don’t mean it to be a perfect analogy, I just found it funny that these are two idiots enacting big sweeping changes in political or economic organization that are likely to end up killing the host. Gorbachev’s USSR died at the hands of the US and its puppets while in the US capital seems to be cannibalizing itself.

      • adam_y@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m not sure calling Gorbechev an idiot is right though.

        Just because he was a victim of external interests, as you describe. Feels a bit victim-blamey.

        “Look what you made the US do to you”.

        Yeltsin, maybe though.