• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    I had a coworker who bought a used one five years ago who said it was great having the first owner do all the repairs.

        • alanjaow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Webster’s updated “literally”. It now includes the definition “to add emphasis”, since people keep using it incorrectly. They update the dictionary to reflect current usage, so I get it, but it still makes me sad.

          • setsubyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            If this sort of thing didn’t happen, you would just have claimed that seeing the dictionary entry makes you not hungry. (Original meaning of sad in Old English, cognate with German satt which still has this meaning.)

                • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I didn’t mean contronyms.

                  One example of what I mean is the word knight. It used to mean boy or servant. The German word Knecht still means (farmers) servant.

                  Another is ‘nice’, which used to mean ‘simple, foolish, ignorant’.

          • 0ops@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Mark my words, it’s going to happen again with “objectively”. I see stuff like this constantly:

            This art piece is objectively good

            That’s not what’s objectively means?