• humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The appropriate criticism here is about corrupt markets resulting from restricted/scarce housing supply. Fair markets that encourage abundant housing supply, are ones that would lead to “perfect competition” and fair ROI on capital. The oligarchist/capital supremacy model of US/west corrupts markets against abundance, because extortionist profits fund politicians to protect extortionist profits.

    UBI, not democracy, is the important freedom that can address structural corruption, but still the option to rent still needs to pay for the capital/expense investment in allowing you to rent.

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      corrupt markets resulting from restricted/scarce housing supply

      Housing has a hard limit as there is only so much ground available in desirable locations. Building houses also needs resources and labor and takes a while.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        We can go pretty high, but 3-5 stories has easier construction, and doesn’t need expensive elevator system. 4th and 5th floor without an elevator advantages young people, but reduced rent still can be profitable vs stopping at 3 stories.