• 109 Posts
  • 3.23K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 23rd, 2024

help-circle

  • Russia was forced to “invade” Ukraine. EU was forced to accept the US forcing Russia to defend itself. Sanctions, Nordstream, extortionist US energy imports, austerity to fund NATO commitments and fight US war for US. EU’s role in one of the most evil wars in history, is by far the most pathethic evil subjugation of own people in service of demonism in history.

    By standing up to Russia’s aggressions they are showing the world that they will not tolerate military invasions into another country.

    Sadly, dead wrong. CIA puppet EU regimes are deflecting their full submission to the US through Russophobia tough talk, and the proof of “US applies rules to others world order” is the shameful sycophantic reaction to Venezuela.

    Trump threatening to annex other countries is giving a green light to dictators like Putin and Xi Jingping to invade other countries.

    Such deals to carve up the world are possible, and US settling for Latin America long term a path to delaying its collapse. But the EU has placed itself on the menu, with its demonic evil baseless Russophobia propaganda soapbox, instead of being a power broker.


  • EU’s war intensification on Russia is purely submission to the US’s war on Nordstream, and US’s war on Russia that never ended. Entirety of it is evil on purely false pretenses.

    The EU is incapable of resisting US while maintaining a war on Russia, and the main distancing from US it needs to make is obeying US warmongering policy towards world including Russia and China. It is US and US alone that is a threat to world/global security. But total control over devoted colonies is essential to its evil.

    While I disagree with labelling Russia and China as abusive, the only relevant question is which side is the lesser abusive. Getting that wrong is what makes NATO and other colonies part of the problem.




  • NATO approved parties select a list of pro NATO candidates who will be appointed to EU parliament based on CIA/Atlanticist tolerance/support for that party. There are 4 leftist representatives from Greece in EU whose party is divided about NATO, and who were suppressed in last election because of it. I’m unsure if the representatives specifically vote against all NATO BS Russophobia. Among NATO member nations AfD leads a group that include Bulgaria’s revival party (17 as a group). (Europe of Sovereign Nations). Both of these parties serve US interests of promoting divisiveness in EU. AfD has had direct boosting/interference for its behalf by Trump and Musk, and if they are ever able to have influence, NATO (performative rather than substantive) opposition will likely be rewarded by US, while simultaneously increasing US purchases. Orban’s party has 10 seats, and like other right wing parties, rationality towards Russia is an electoral asset that permits other oppression.

    There are 419 absolute NATO cronies in EU parliament, and the election process ensures that the most devoted to NATO subjugation are appointed, because the CIA rewards the party for input on their list.


  • Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

    US interest in Greenland has 0 to do with resources (which are extremely expensive to develop and far away from markets) and everything to do with replacing NATO military bases with US bases in order to directly threaten Europe more effectively.

    The collective cowardice of the colonies divided by US attacks on their economies, and coercive miltiary equipment tribute demands, and cheerleading for Venezuela takeover, and other recent blatant election interference in Latin America (Bolivia, Honduras, Argentina, Brazil) means there are no lines in the sand. No one will come to Greenland or Canada’s defense, because the cowardice that responds to US aggression against its colonies is to devote tributes in order to fight Russia alone.

    There are CIA allegiants on lemmy who setup a US invasion of Greenland as a US ploy to donate all of its resources to Russia, which means just more increased Russophobia as a response and more devotion to the US to help with Napoleonic fantasies on fighting Russia.

    The line in the sand on Canada’s/Europe’s military cooperation with the US should have been drawn at tariffs. For Canada, fentanyl excuse for tariffs is accepting a categorical lie, just as the pretext for kidnapping Maduro.












  • Obviously the first view of coup/colonization is from nationalist oligarchy perspective. Those who give Trump kickbacks will get free assets and resources, and can gain even if oil prices fall. Controlling more than the US needs has always been a strategic gain, and you shouldn’t understand the failure of developing Iraq and Libya as failures, but the goal all along. Ensuring China didn’t help develop Venezuela is a strategic win.

    Industry whining against more oil supply will be listened to if they keep paying to be listened to. Most likely outcome will be stealing resources without investment, and that is minimal additional supply. Health of Alberta industry will not be a concern.

    Long term, if Venezuala is US’s BFF, it drastically reduces the economic viability of any other oil project. There is a global establishment, including North American oil oligarchy, but also everyone inside Venezuela not being bribed to be the US’s BFF, who would sabotage this.

    Analysis of this subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxZmlUXSAEs