Person A: Vague, sexist generalizations deserve rude answers.
Person B: WHAT ABOUT WOMEN IN AFGHANISTAN?!
So, what about women’s treatment in Afghanistan disproves the claim “Vague, sexist generalizations deserve rude answers”?
Do vague, sexist generalizations not deserve rude answers because of the treatment of women in Afghanistan?
Maybe if women were treated better in Afghanistan then vague sexist answers would be more deserving of rude answers?.. Or would they be less deserving?
Are you a bot? Because nothing that you typed makes any sense, at all, in this context.
O shit you were serious?? Thabks for misinterpreting my comment btw. Let me correct that for you.
sadly I have to take a comment justifying sexist generalizations on men because males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously.
It’s not the part about men having more priviledges that people are having issues with, it’s the part that THAT somehow excuses being sexist against men.
Vague, sexist generalizations deserve rude answers.
Women in Afghanistan are not allowed to speak or be seen through windows.
Is there are a country where men are treated the same?
Edit: Wow. Imagine if y’all get as upset about rape and femicide as you did about sometimes women being a little snotty to men online.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
Response to your edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
Doesn’t apply. They provided a direct example that disproves your claim.
Person A: Vague, sexist generalizations deserve rude answers.
Person B: WHAT ABOUT WOMEN IN AFGHANISTAN?!
So, what about women’s treatment in Afghanistan disproves the claim “Vague, sexist generalizations deserve rude answers”?
Do vague, sexist generalizations not deserve rude answers because of the treatment of women in Afghanistan?
Maybe if women were treated better in Afghanistan then vague sexist answers would be more deserving of rude answers?.. Or would they be less deserving?
Are you a bot? Because nothing that you typed makes any sense, at all, in this context.
Removed by mod
Damn, Poe’s Law hittin this comment hard, and I can’t tell from the instance either.
Edit: oh Jesus, they were serious. Parody truly is dead. At least we get to publicly shame the stupid misandrist.
Non exaggerated non explicit comments without enough context deserve to be taken seriously. Sadly.
It seems that you nailed it.
O shit you were serious?? Thabks for misinterpreting my comment btw. Let me correct that for you.
It’s not the part about men having more priviledges that people are having issues with, it’s the part that THAT somehow excuses being sexist against men.
if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.
The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
So your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
that’s realistically more achievable than the other way around
Women are privileged by the patriarchy in some ways too, so I guess misogyny’s back on the menu, right? /s
Dumb misandrist.
Are there places so privileged where women have harems of male sex slaves? Is there a country with organized matriarchy?
Congratulations, you missed the point.
deleted by creator
“My political beliefs allow me to be a jerk to people”.