• FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ummm we still have like 5 million votes to count in california alone, stop posting incomplete statistics as if they are comparable to previous years full statistics

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Ummm the votes aren’t counted but they have been received and accepted, which means the voters’ names and parties are known. We were getting numbers of voters by party for weeks before election day as mail-in ballots were received. But you’re getting a lot of upvotes so clearly you must be right anyway.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          5 days ago

          I get what your saying and I agree, but it’s funny/sad that you could add all 5 million of those votes to the Dems and the graphic would still be making the same point.

            • Donkter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Well for one thing, it would go to a 7.5% decrease not sure where you split the hairs on that and as I mentioned that would be in the best case scenario where every last one of those 5 million votes went to Harris, which they wouldn’t. Comparing any of those to a .75% change makes it nuts.

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Again, this isn’t vote counts it’s votes by party. We were getting these counts before election day as ballots were received, because they are validated upon receipt, thus identifying the voter and their party before counting who they voted for.