Coast to coast, major U.S. cities are seeing measurable drops in drug overdose deaths. Public health officials welcome the news despite an inability to fully explain the decrease.

After years of rising, the tide may finally be turning on deadly drug overdoses in America.

Drug overdose deaths fell 12.7% in the 12 months ending in May, according to preliminary data released Wednesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“This is the largest recorded reduction in overdose deaths,” White House officials said in a statement. “And the sixth consecutive month of reported decreases in predicted 12-month total numbers of drug overdose deaths.”

It’s also the first time since early 2021 that the number of estimated drug overdose deaths for a 12-month period fell below 100,000, to 98,820.

It’s categorically good news. It’s also a bit puzzling to the public health experts who have been working for years to stop the upward trajectory of opioid deaths, driven primarily by fentanyl.

  • polarpear11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I went to pick a prescription at my local Walmart today (texas) and they had a sign saying that they have narcan or noloxone available. My guess is the easy access to narcan and the awareness of it nowadays.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    OK, let’s keep doing what we’re doing: endless troll posting of attack ad propaganda about candidates in the upcmoming election. Because somehow its saving lives?

  • KaptinBackstabba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Public and first responder access to Narcan. Paramedic and I haven’t had to administer it in months thanks to bystanders, law enforcement and fire rescue getting it on board before I arrive

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In my city, there’s a LOT of homeless addicts who abuse drugs. My city invested heavily in providing specialists who walk around with narcan and other supplies.

      A few years prior to that, Law enforcement used to arrest these addicts.

      • BugKilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So what you’re saying is that they (the city) treated it as a medical problem and not a law enforcement problem. Now you’re seeing fewer deaths and better outcomes for addicts who clearly need help. All they need to do now is work on the mental health issues to treat homelessness and addiction and then gain societal profit. It’s like there is a kinda of logic to treating people with empathy and respect results in better outcomes…

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No. It’s that most drug users have become aware of narcan, how to use it, and that we started leaving narcan with addicts and their family members after running an overdose call to them, that pretty much all the police, fire, and ems all keep narcan on hand, and that anyone can walk into target and buy the stuff.

      Pretty much all the overdoses are from heroin and/or fentanyl. Narcan just gets misted up a nostril and about 2 to 5 minutes later it’s taken over the receptors that heroin/fentanyl bind to.

      So the drug problem isn’t lessening. We just started handing out the antidote to an overdose like candy on Halloween

    • draughtcyclist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Judging from the fact that Oregon, Washington and Colorado are not seeing deaths reduced my thought is no.

      But it should still happen.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If you tell people that if they do a certain thing that it will most likely kill them or have a high likelihood of killing them … eventually enough people begin to understand that.

    Children and young people are also very intelligent people with no preconceived or prejudiced ideas of their own (unless taught by someone else) … so they are quick to learn from the mistakes of others around them if given the chance.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If you tell people that if they do a certain thing that it will most likely kill them or have a high likelihood of killing them … eventually enough people begin to understand that.

      And the important part is that it’s the truth this time.

      Before, they were saying weed would kill people. That got a segment of a generation who would grow up wondering “What else were they lying about?”

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The difference this time is that just about everyone now knows someone who either died or was severely affected by opioids. No better way to drive home the truth than by direct examples and demonstrations.

        Personally, I know four people who died of drug overdoses, a dozen more in my extended circle of family and friends and two who are living vegetables from overdoses.

        I’m willing to bet that you probably know someone yourself.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I know zero people that belong in either of those groups. I’m pretty sure one degree of separation from me also have zero of those people in their friend groups. Anecdotes aren’t evidence.

          • P00ptart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Agreed. I’ve never known anyone hooked on opioids despite the fact that I know 3 people with astonishing levels of chronic pain. 2 of them have POTS. I was on tons of Vicodin for nearly 3 years though the VA, and then one day they decided to throw a single bottle of muscle relaxers at me and that did the trick. The pain was gone. When I told them I was good and didn’t need the Vicodin anymore, it stopped and I still had like 240 7.5 mg of it left. Which I used for stuff like headaches lol. I was very lucky I never got addicted.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        If you’re not in a shithole Republican state: the ACA allows lots of homeless drug addicts to seek treatment they would otherwise be unable to afford, because they don’t have income or a home, so they qualify for most treatments to be covered. This allows many to fix their lives, although many still do not. Yes, obese meth addicts with heart failure exist.

      • JaymesRS
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I know a few physicians who have already been seeing it in their practice.