Starfield steam page for the DLC currently shows eight user review score of 41%, making this one of the worst Bethesda DLC’s released of all time. This is so horribly, shockingly bad for Bethesda, because it shows as a gaming company, they are no longer capable of delivering a really good gaming experience as they had in the past. Some of the reviews sum up quite nicely what is wrong with this DLC…

Less content than any skyrim DLC. Less than The Fallout 4 story DLCs. Doesn’t change of the complaints people had with the base game, writing is still at a 4th grade level.

Quick: If you are looking to buy my answer is no, you aren’t missing much content. I was really hoping to enjoy this DLC. Took about 4 hours for the main story and maybe 2 more hours to 100% the achievements.

These two reviews I think really summed up what Starfield has become, $70 for an AAAA title that has extremely little buy-in from the community, horrifically low amount of replayability and can be breezed through easily. It’s mind-boggling to see this

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.worldEnglish
    252·
    3 months ago

    Bethesda was obviously already toast to anyone paying attention when Fallout '76 came out. They certainly haven’t improved since.

    …And I can’t believe that these are the motherfuckers who own the rights to Doom now.

    • samus12345@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      3 months ago

      Thankfully, they’re not the ones who develop Doom. They can publish it all they want as long as they stay the hell away from the actual games.

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.eeEnglish
      710·
      3 months ago

      saying 76 hasnt improved since just shows everyone you dont know what youre talking about