Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 3 months agoOpinion: Harris’s agenda mirrors the Democratic Socialists of Americawww.msn.comexternal-linkmessage-square232fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down174
arrow-up1-55arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: Harris’s agenda mirrors the Democratic Socialists of Americawww.msn.comSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square232fedilink
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·3 months ago1, voting is not harm reduction, and 2, that video has given you a false conclusion. the lesson we should learn is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, and the only way to keep third parties is to continue to vote for them.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months ago Yes absolutely it is 2. I remember this account and it makes total sense you’re campaigning for Jill fucking Stein. Jesus Christ 🤮
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·3 months agoharm reduction is a specific thing. voting is not harm reduction.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoUnless you care about truth in which case it absolutely is harm reduction
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·3 months agoharm reduction has a specific definition. voting is not harm reduction.
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoNot really interested in your pedantry that probably isn’t even technically correct (not that it matters)
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·3 months agohttps://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/
minus-squarepooperNickel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoThe url itself says it’s talking about a specific context that has nothing to do with this.
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·3 months agoI can’t make you read
1, voting is not harm reduction, and 2, that video has given you a false conclusion. the lesson we should learn is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, and the only way to keep third parties is to continue to vote for them.
harm reduction is a specific thing. voting is not harm reduction.
Unless you care about truth in which case it absolutely is harm reduction
harm reduction has a specific definition. voting is not harm reduction.
Not really interested in your pedantry that probably isn’t even technically correct (not that it matters)
https://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/
The url itself says it’s talking about a specific context that has nothing to do with this.
I can’t make you read