I can’t make you read

https://www.indigenousaction.org/voting-is-not-harm-reduction-an-indigenous-perspective/

harm reduction has a specific definition. voting is not harm reduction.

harm reduction is a specific thing. voting is not harm reduction.

that’s not what her platform says

Jill stein is running against Trump

you can’t prove a negative, but a positive claim has been offered here. so the person putting forward the claim must support it, as a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

That’s not math. those are just questions.

The only votes that help a candidate are votes for that candidate. A non-vote doesn’t help any candidate.

this is just hand waving. it’s not proof.

if that were true, you could prove it. there is no world in which non votes are counted for Trump

hexbear isn’t fascist

no, it’s not

It’s mathematically Impossible to have a 3rd party in the US

you’re making that up

we can all see that you are not accurately characterizing this thread. it’s public.

more handwaving

I haven’t made any such claim. I’m not defending a claim I didn’t make.

this still isn’t evidence. it is just handwaving.

you haven’t presented any evidence for any claims. saying it doesn’t make it true.

1, voting is not harm reduction, and 2, that video has given you a false conclusion. the lesson we should learn is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, and the only way to keep third parties is to continue to vote for them.