- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
This is the hill I’m going to die on. I will continue to ingest text or die trying.
Videos take too long to skim thru and parse yourself, I wanna get to the keywords
they so so fucking intolerably slow to get any amount of information out of. useless for sharing any information
Yep. I like both. But if I want the gist of something fast or am not in an environment or situation I can sit and watch without disturbing or being disturbed by others. I want text. No fiddling with a progress bar to get back to where I was. Quick easy done. At home I’ll watch videos all day. But it will never be as efficient.
Yep.
I do plenty of audiobooks for longer form content, where I know I want all of it. But I absolutely have no interest in having 10 paragraphs turned into a 10 minute video.
Imagine that this reply comment thread is a series of videos.
Says the text based article😅… Load of shit. There’s little I despise more than someone making a video of something that could have been two lines of text or hell, 20 lines of text. Video can be such an expressive medium, stop shitting on the format by using inappropriatly. If anything the pendulum has already swung way too far towards video and hopefully things will rationalize soon. When I have to watch some dumb video, I put captions on and usually just read the captions. Wish there was a tool for YouTube that just extracted whole caption transcripts so I didn’t even need to play the videos.
If you click “see more” in the description, there is a transcription! It’s still kinda pain im the ass, but allows getting through it faster…it’s not perfect tho.
Also. Captions and 2x speed ftw.
Paywall, so I’m just going to respond to the title’s premise.
Video is relatively new, sure, but it will never replace text. The two supplement each other, and that’s been the case since YouTube first came out.
TikTok exists, but so did Vine, until it didn’t. What’s on the rise (again) is podcasts. Meanwhile, text has existed for thousands of years and continues to exist alongside video and audio. So I don’t think text is going anywhere, and what little I could read of the article sounds like someone experiencing the Dunning-Kruger Effect and confirmation bias who hasn’t actually done any historical or anthropological research.
Sounds about right for someone terminally on TikTok.
Plus, there’s something to be said for efficiency. Text takes up very little disk space, where video takes up a lot of disk space. I hear of people that use like a terabyte worth of data per month on their internet connections. And personally, I can’t even get over 100 gigs, even with downloading books and watching some YouTube(99% audio only).
deleted by creator
Video is relatively new, sure, but it will never replace text
The problem is that, for most people, it has. They’re not willing to read.
And that’s the claim I’m rejecting. I think it’s confirmation bias, not a fact that stems from evidence.
I see it daily with most people I interact with in multiple, varied communities (and no, I don’t and refuse to use those platforms, because video content is shit).
They will not read two paragraphs of text. They will happily spend hours churning through junk short videos.
I get it. That’s still confirmation bias, because in comparison, the people that I’m around read often. Our individual experiences are not good ways to determine what people in general are doing.
That’s not what confirmation bias means. Confirmation bias has absolutely nothing to do with sample size or what you’re exposed to.
It’s ignoring the evidence you see in order to prop up a pre-existing belief.
Just a life hack for this article and other websites as welll: Disable JavaScript.
