• poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That definition (in the subsection about political theory only) seems fine, but it says little about how to practically determine ownership of personal property. The commonly agreed method to do so is “regular usage”, as I have been repeating here many times over…

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Who is commonly agreeing to this? What counts as “regular usage”? I regularly use the toilet at work. Would it become my personal property?

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The various people that have developed this political & economic theory on which for example the definition on the Wikipedia page you linked is based on. This is literally something that has been discussed in detail for over 150 years now.

          And yes, you as an employee of a company would become a co-owner of that company, and therefore the toilet would be partially yours, but obviously not exclusively.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            Ελληνικά
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The various people that have developed this political & economic theory on which for example the definition on the Wikipedia page you linked is based on.

            The word “regular” appears 0 times I the article I linked. What did you read?

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I already said that the Wikipedia definition lacks the crucial detail about how to determine when something counts as personal property. But look it up yourself, there are entire books on the topic.

                  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    Ελληνικά
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Thank you. Long document, and I’m working through it.

                    Question so far though…

                    I have a house in my possession, I live in it, and I regularly maintain it. I’d like to go live in a different, nicer house. How do I do that?

                    The document also states that a person has a right to their labor, so if I work on my house and improve it, or just really stop it from falling into disrepair, how do I access the value of that labor when I no longer need the house, without forcing economic violence on the person thst possesses it next?

                    Where is the limit on what I can possess? Am I allowed to walk in the woods regularly and claim I possess it? What is the difference the walls and a roof that I possess as my house, versus the woods that I walk through?