I’m planning on building a new gaming PC in the next couple of months. I haven’t done so in about 7 years, so I’m a bit behind the times on hardware. Is there any special considerations you all would recommend when it comes to gaming on Linux? I already run Linux as my daily driver and have a home server, etc, so I’m mainly looking for suggestions regarding current hardware that I would want to consider for my new build.

I haven’t done so before, but I’m interested in running Windows in a QEMU VM to avoid some of the pitfalls for certain multiplayer experiences in certain titles. If anybody has any experience with this also, I’d love to hear about it!

Thanks for any input you all have!

  • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
    3·
    1 year ago

    I’m interested in running Windows in a QEMU VM to avoid some of the pitfalls for certain multiplayer experiences in certain titles.

    This may not be such a good idea. Many multiplayer games detect VMs and can ban your account. It’d best to keep Windows around in a dual-boot setup if you’re intending to play online games. In saying that, are you up-to-speed with the current developments in Proton? If not, you should check ProtonDB to see if the games you’re playing is supported now or not. Proton receives updates quite regularly, and more and more games are becoming compatible with every new release.

    Beyond that, you can’t really go wrong with an all-AMD build: AMD CPUs are better for gaming in general, and AMD GPUs have excellent support in Linux (you only need the opensource drivers btw, so you don’t need to install anything special or proprietary).

  • dark_stang@beehaw.orgEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    I’d suggest Intel for networking and an AMD graphics card if you want things to work out if the box.

    • Urist@lemmy.mlEnglish
      4·
      1 year ago

      Having OS-agnostic options for BIOS updates is also kind of nice. I don’t know if this is the norm, but I can do it painless on my Asus motherboard.

      • dark_stang@beehaw.orgEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        For most “enthusiast” boards, you can update the uefi/bios without an OS. I’ve even seen some that will do it without needing to use the CPU, so that you can update to support a newer (currently unsupported) processor.

  • hallettj@beehaw.orgEnglish
    0·
    1 year ago

    I think one of the most impactful choices in my last build was choosing a fast SSD. Not all SSDs are the same! Nowadays you can get NVMe drives that operate over PCIe instead of SATA which provide much higher throughput.

    You can either get an M.2 form factor that plugs into a special socket on the motherboard and takes up minimal space, or a PCI card that plugs into the same type of slot as a graphics card. (Note that some M.2 drives / sockets are SATA, not NVMe, so watch out for that distinction.)

    There is also some difference between NVMe implementations depending on which PCIe version they support. And you’ll want a motherboard that implements the same PCIe version. This applies to both M.2 and PCIe SSDs.

    This stuff might be old enough that you’ve already encountered it. But it was new to me when I built my last PC in 2020. Other than that building was pretty much as I remembered from previous decades.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      0·
      1 year ago

      GPUs got a lot bigger and more power-hungry. So you need to check the PSU and it’s 8/16 pin GPU connector as well as space in the case.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
          0·
          1 year ago

          I was a bit confused reading your comment, given that the vast majority of the world has 220V everywhere 😅

          But actually a ATX PSU steps down the the power to 12V anyway, so I doubt 110V or 220V makes much of a difference.

          • Cole@midwest.socialOPEnglish
            01·
            1 year ago

            Supposedly 220V is a little more efficient to step down than 110V? I’ve read a lot of articles about data mining where they run the mining rigs off of 220V in the USA instead of 110V and they gain something like 5% efficiency. They’re doing it with entire shipping containers full of PCs though. On my single PC, I’m not sure I can tell the difference at all. But I’m an Electrical Engineer by trade, so it makes me feel better that I’m more power efficient and have my panel balanced. I was running the 220V for my server rack anyway, so it wasn’t a lot of effort to pull one more circuit for my Desktop PC.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    1 year ago

    If you are going to get WiFi, try to get Intel Wi-Fi, it’s usually pretty solid.

    Outside of that, AMD is generally better for graphics (esp. if you’re interested in messing with Wayland) and CPU is fine with both. I don’t think RTX or DLSS really works on Linux, but I could be wrong there.

    But honestly, pretty much everything works fine. I used NVIDIA and a ghetto WiFi chip set for years and it was fine. I couldn’t use Wayland and variable refresh didn’t work properly with my dual monitor setup, but eveningy else worked fine.

    So I wouldn’t put a ton of energy into Linux compatibility, unless there’s something that you really need to ensure stays compatible.