• @Rambler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    410 months ago

    Recently visited York (UK) and they have a fantastic bus system - and they’re electric.

    • @Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Busses in my city are also going electric. So far only the local routes. The longer distance routes are still diesel

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      Or maybe tell bosses that if your job can be done remotely it should be done remotely. Then there’s more room on the bus for people who need to be in meatspace to do their jobs.

  • @nogrub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    but this isn’t new technology where you can write a 100 bullshit news article about and prais it as the next big thing because it actually works and is efficient

  • @Drun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    Ah, you should see buses in my city. Dirty, thirty years old, overpopulated graves on wheels with no air conditioners.

    Never again.

  • @over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Nice. I have to travel like 17 miles to the nearest bus station. This fixes everything! /s

    Better off with my own vehicle when it’s only like 8 miles to work. I’d be literally wasting 9 miles to the bus station and 9 miles back in my own vehicle to even get back and forth to the bus station.

    Edit: Seriously, have any of you tried traveling 17 miles to the west, only to catch a bus going 25 miles to the east, passing your own town to get to work? Then going 25 miles back, only to have to drive your own vehicle back home, because the bus don’t stop there?

    Better off just taking my own vehicle to work.

    • @Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Infrastructure and non transit orieted developmental problem. the place you live was likely built with only the car in mind.

  • @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    The correct answer actually should -and could- be 0 gallons if they simply cycle to work. Granted, that requires them to have the right infrastructure available, but if (once) that existed, the vast majority of the work force could cycle to work happily. Most people don’t live 20 miles or more from where they work

    • @WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Sure, I’d love to cycle 56km to and from work each day. Especially right after a night shift.

      We should just invent portals already.

      • @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        56 kms is far, indeed. Thsts what you make public transportation for. Trains, busses.

        Well done, the would be more comfortable and faster than a car.

        However, I did 25 kms to and from every day. Took me 45 minutes and it was super healthy

        • XiELEd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          45 minutes is a long time near nightfall, though… Honestly I’d rather take a bus at 5PM, even at 12km, since there are other people and it feels much safer.

    • @cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It could also be 0 gallons if the busses are electrified, or if the rail system is expanded, or if we stop pushing office workers to commute every day.

      There are many routes to 0 emissions.

      • @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Oh sure.

        I’m just sayjt that we need to change the way we live. Like you said, people should not be required to work in offices anymore. If they physically need to be at locations, let them walk for short distances, cycle for medium distances and use public transportation for large distances.

        Most cities in the world have been redesigned over the past 80 years for cars. It’s insane and it left most cities awful places to live in. Almost all Dutch cities have been redesigned for people. So people walk and cycle because they can, and the cities look and feel amazing and beautiful.

    • @totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      How many gallons does the ambulance take to get the cyclist to the hospital after the hit and run?

      (Seriously tho bicycles ftw except in winter)

      • @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Less, probably, because cycling in on itself is safer than driving a car. Lower speeds, less mass, less injuries.

        Also, winter cycling.is awesome

        • @totallynotarobot@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I was being facetious; ambulance fuel use is a silly comparison :)

          Listening to all y’all winter cyclists I lament that I live in a city where the bike lanes are where the city piles up the snow it plows off the car lanes on the streets. RIP me. It gives me hope and happiness to know that there are cities that don’t do this!

    • ThenThreeMore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Is that still true for modern hybrid buses?

      Edit - also surely mean you need to average 7 people as when it’s full it’ll be a little over 12 times as efficient as when there’s 7 people. So it could run for 10 minutes full then about 2 hours completely empty and it would balance.

      • PatFusty
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -110 months ago

        No i meant 7 cars worth of people. If a bus can displace 7 cars then it is only equal in efficiency. This applies to hybrid buses too as they only get marginally better performance per energy needed to use.

          • PatFusty
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            The average number of people per car is 1.5 so its not like its crazy off. Not sure how that doesnt make sense

            • ThenThreeMore
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              So you’d need the bus to have 10.5 people at all times? But why doesn’t an average capacity work? Do you have an figures to back so this up, especially the hybrid bus claims?

  • @Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    That’s great when all those people live in the same block and go to work at the same company and have the same hours.

    But Frank lives 10 miles away and works on the other side of town. And Tim lives 3 towns over and works the night shift. Bill lives in the country and works 40 miles away. Eddy lost a leg in the war and while he is only 1/2 mile from the bus station, can’t walk that far with his disability.

    When it is convenient, it is convenient, but there’s a reason why when given the choice, most normal people will drive their car instead no matter what the nonsense in this subs likes to pretend is real.

    • @Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Spoken like a true clueless 'murican. What the fuck do you think bus lines are?

    • XiELEd
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Maybe your public transport infrastructure needs improvement? I don’t think this post wants to judge you— it’s advocating for public transport to be paid more attention. My cousin lives 3 towns away from her workplace— she commutes with a bus or jeepney. We have either buses, vans, or jeepneys; combined they operate 24/7. Hell, my university has students more than 5 municipalities away, the buses start operations early in the morning. Our classes start at 6:30 AM. Oh and btw, our buses have routes more than 300km. Maybe even more. Regarding Eddy, we have something in my country called a motorela or a tricycle, that operates locally in neighbourhoods. He won’t have to walk far, he just has to wait for one and let it deliver him to a waiting area.

    • @uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 months ago

      can’t walk that far with his disability.

      Neither he can drive. Or in some countries even not allowed to.

      while he is only 1/2 mile from the bus station

      1. This is seriously fucked.
      2. Powered wheelchair.
      • @Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Hand-controls are a thing. Eddy is perfectly fine driving his handi-van around. He’s not too keen on when motorcycles part in between the handicapped spots though.

        • @Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Jessie got shot in the face in the war, his lack of depth perception from having one eye stops him from driving.

          Fred, Stephanie, Phil, Jack, and Masha all have severe hearing loss from the war (Jack’s is actually from training for the war), while they can still drive, it’s safer for them not too.

          Nick, Chloe, Phil (different Phil), and Jessie (same Jessie) all got blown up in the war, driving vehicles is extremely stressful for them. Being a passenger to varying less degrees. Trains don’t seem to trigger any reaction, and busses don’t for at least one of them (not sure about the others)