• federal reverse@feddit.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    What would be the benefit of open war against Russia, especially if NATO were to start it? I see absolutely nothing.

    There’s a lot of room for additional sanctions against Russia too. The EU is still importing fossil gas and nuclear fuel, for example. Countries like Cyprus and the UK can probably still freeze additional Russian funds. […]

      • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Russia emits misinformation, Russia attacks through Interwebs, Russia employs espionage, Russia sabotages. But Russia has not performed a full-scale military attack on any NATO country. And unless they do, in the eye of any onlooker, NATO would be the one to start the altercation.

          • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Ukraine is not a NATO country, for better or worse. (It’s anyone’s guess whether Russia would have attacked Ukraine if they were a NATO member.)

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The best sanctions we could impose is a complete shutdown of all of Russia’s Internet access. You’d see massive reduction in disinformation across the web.