This is just too torturous to prove without a miracle in discovery. A summary judgement would throw it out. And I just don’t see a judge allowing discovery without a very compelling reason. I don’t see any.

The share price dropped in response to him selling, not because he knew it would drop before he sold due to some inside track in the company.

I agree there’s a good amount of shit this bozo could be nailed on by his shareholders, I just don’t think this is remotely it.