A New Jersey electrician who repeatedly attacked police officers during the Jan. 6, 2021, siege at the U.S. Capitol was sentenced on Friday to 12 years in prison by a judge who called him “a menace to our society.”

Christopher Joseph Quaglin argued with and insulted U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden before and after the judge handed him one of the longest prison sentences among hundreds of Capitol riot cases.

“You’re Trump’s worst mistake of 2016,” Quaglin told McFadden, who was nominated to the court by then-President Donald Trump in 2017.

“What an outrage. What a disgrace,” the judge said.

Quaglin complained about his jail conditions and pushed conspiracy theories about the Jan. 6 siege during his rambling remarks in the courtroom. He also took issue with labeling the Jan. 6 attack as an insurrection.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    “You’re Trump’s worst mistake of 2016,” Quaglin told McFadden, who was nominated to the court by then-President Donald Trump in 2017.

    Same amount of attention to detail and grasp of readily available facts as his Dear Leader, I see…

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly I’d be happy if there was punishment for it. Assholes running around screaming about the flag should be called to the table on defacing it.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Flag burning is probably the highest you can get in the ratio of dissatisfaction with your nation to violence caused. I say leave it just for that alone. There is the free speech/expression argument, too.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that only counts for remaking a literal flag into one of those things, not clothes, bedding, or drapery designed to look like one.

      Silly distinction, I know, but that’s how it usually goes in that FUBAR “justice” system…

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        People burn the flag, and I think most of us feel we should have the right to burn it even if we personally find it distasteful. (I think I’ve said that exact same thing before to people on the right about folks on the left.) These people are assholes and criminals, but let’s apply the law equally to all. I wouldn’t endorse punishing someone on the left for disrespecting the flag, so I wouldn’t endorse it for someone on the right. We’ve caught them committing actual crimes, and that’s sufficient for me.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Agreed. I’m pretty sure the other commenter was just pointing out the hypocrisy of disrespecting their religious symbol (since that’s how fervent their jingoism is) like that and I was just explaining how the law specifically endorses duch hypocrisy lol

    • prowess2956@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Just like the Second Amendment, there was no possible way for our ancestors to foresee the multitudinous manners of future flag disrespect.

      • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Flags cost money and they’d never believe anyone would be stupid enough to make a burkini out of them for a 325lb “Christian” man.

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s not true. Abraham Lincoln designed the flag specifically to prevent it from being disrespected. The color choices make it physically impossible to defecate on.

          • Fal@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s actually a reference to a Mr show sketch. But yeah that’s a bonus

          • Agrivar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Shit, I must have missed a memo! Did we collectively decide to start poisoning Lemmy comments proactively?

            (don’t get me wrong, I support this idea, just looking for clarity)

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I highly doubt he will learn much after getting out. He will probably be even more radicalized after.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Maybe he’ll learn to not do it again, or it gets the prison scentence.

      Also a bunch of years without that idiot running around in society.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh he wont get out. Someone this stupid is gonna go up to the wrong person, full of undeserved bravado, and get shanked.

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          One can only hope. If he doesn’t have kids, I want to nominate him for the Darwin Awards.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    “You’re Trump’s worst mistake of 2016,” Quaglin told McFadden, who was nominated to the court by then-President Donald Trump in 2017.

    Can’t even get his insults factually correct.

    Quaglin complained about his jail conditions and pushed conspiracy theories about the Jan. 6 siege during his rambling remarks in the courtroom. He also took issue with labeling the Jan. 6 attack as an insurrection.

    You see judge, I was actually an antifa agitator, not a right-wing shithead trying to interfere with an election certification. You don’t understand my case at all!

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      You see, they’re only insurrectionists if they’re from Afghanistan. Otherwise they’re sparkling freedom fighters.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Quaglin complained about his jail conditions

    I absolutely love how republicans all think prisons are insufficiently cruel, then suddenly become prison abolitionists, but only for Trump and Jan 6ers.

    Like nah they’re treating you with kiddy gloves. People got decades for non-violent crimes during the George Floyd protests.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m certain I saw something about someone getting 10+ years for burning police cars back in 2020, but I can’t find it.

        I could be misremembering and it was just the prosecutor asking for it, or google could just be complete shit now.

          • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            According to every law enforcement agency in the U.S., federal and local, property crime is categorically different than violent crime.

            Unless someone was injured or attacked, burning an empty vehicle is only a property crime.

            • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Where is all this caviler attitude to setting fire to something with possibly 20 gallons of accelerant in it’s belly on a public street coming from. Can not speak to other states but NY literally has justification of murder if you see someone setting your residence on fire, you are fully authorized to kill them under law, NYPL 35.20(2) and thats New York (Including NYC). The risk to grave physical injury is so high in a fire that it is okay to kill to stop it. Trying to say literally trying to torch something with a belly of gas on a public street is okay? Do they not still teach about the Great Chicago fire and San Francisco Earthquake Fire in school anymore?