• Codex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    If there already exists “a binary” then that says there are 2 states. “Non-binary” only means there are not-two-states. This could be unary (there is one kind of thing), trinary (there are now 3 things, the old 2 and new, secret 3rd thing), or really any n-ary set of n distinctly numbered things, so long as there aren’t only exactly 2 of them.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Non-binary” only means there are not-two-states.

      The state of having two states and the state of not-having-two-states is itself a two-state solution.

      Unfortunately, once you rule out non-binary as a third state, you collapse back into the original binary state. Thus, non-binary exists as a quantum superposition between states, as we fluctuate between whether or not being non-binary is politically correct.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Going to the UN to propose my Quantum Superposition Solution to Violence in the Middle East.

          • Match!!@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I don’t think anyone will agree to dropping a massive Schrodinger box over the whole region

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              We put a large box over the middle east and left a vial of radioactive material in there.

              Now either Israel ignored it and freaked out about the box like everyone else or they immediately used it to make bombs and eradicate their neighbors out of view.

              Schrodinger’s Palestine.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        But nobody is in the state of having two states, though. People range from being in one state to “it’s complicated”, but how would you be in exactly two states?

    • Codex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I want to upvote the OP for presenting an interesting discussion but downvote them for being wrong. This presents a case for a non-binary voting option.

      A singular like button would still only express one portion of my sentiment. A third option could be many things, none are sufficient: a none or 0 or neutral option is effectively not voting, a sideways arrow or maybe state, or mixed state would express indecision or indeterminism rather than mixed feelings.

      Therefore, I propose that a second positive-negative axis is required. The addition of these “sideways” arrows allow expressing 2 kinds of sentiment: towards the post content, and towards the poster themselves. I will not specify whether left or right is positive nor will i clarify which axis (x or y) corresponds to which kind of sentiment. I’m sure this undefined behavior will cause no problems.

      Here is your composite vote in the new system: ↖️

      • realitista@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        The choice between a traditional up-down vote and a new non-up-down vote must have been a tough one.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m considering identifying as unary now. God only made one gender and “male and female” are mental illnesses caused by the original sin 😔