I mean… Reagan not only cheered on the death of LGBTQ+ people, he actively caused many of those deaths because of his policy decisions during the AIDS crisis.
Civility is out the window. But it was Reagan who threw it.
His administration, and his press secretary, used to refer to AIDS as “the gay plague” that only affected “fairies”. And because it only affected the undesirables, they dragged their feet on addressing the issue. Reagan’s actions were genocidal.
I showed you evidence that his administration’s official position was that it was fine for LGBTQ+ people to die of AIDS. Quotes from his press secretary, the official who speaks on the administration’s behalf. Audio recordings of the room, which included Reagan, erupting into laughter when talking about gay people dying.
I gave you more than enough evidence that he supported the death of LGBTQ+ people.
excuse me until i receive photographic evidence of reagan literally cumming in his pants as a white house aide whispers in his ear about deaths that he’s caused i’m not going to accept any possibility that he was anti lgbt
I find that a fundamentally ridiculous point of view, that human life is something so valuable that, paradoxically, no amount of human lives ended could ever justify wishing death on someone, but props for consistency, I guess.
That presumes that wishing for someone’s death dehumanizes them.
If Hitler had been captured, what would killing him have done? I am against the death penalty as well.
Created an example and a precedent that rulership is not a shield against punishment? Removed a vile human being from existence? Avenged the literal millions of helpless innocents he ordered slaughtered?
Just wish for a solution to the problem,
Death is often a viable solution. Oftentimes more viable than the alternatives.
How many deaths does Reagan get to cause before it exceeds “Agree to disagree” territory?
deleted by creator
I mean… Reagan not only cheered on the death of LGBTQ+ people, he actively caused many of those deaths because of his policy decisions during the AIDS crisis.
Civility is out the window. But it was Reagan who threw it.
deleted by creator
His administration, and his press secretary, used to refer to AIDS as “the gay plague” that only affected “fairies”. And because it only affected the undesirables, they dragged their feet on addressing the issue. Reagan’s actions were genocidal.
deleted by creator
Pedantic little wanker, aren’t you?
deleted by creator
I showed you evidence that his administration’s official position was that it was fine for LGBTQ+ people to die of AIDS. Quotes from his press secretary, the official who speaks on the administration’s behalf. Audio recordings of the room, which included Reagan, erupting into laughter when talking about gay people dying.
I gave you more than enough evidence that he supported the death of LGBTQ+ people.
Your argument is insufferably pedantic.
excuse me until i receive photographic evidence of reagan literally cumming in his pants as a white house aide whispers in his ear about deaths that he’s caused i’m not going to accept any possibility that he was anti lgbt
So, you wouldn’t wish death on, say, Hitler? Would you say those that did in WW2 were no longer human?
Hey! Say what you want about Hitler, but he did kill Hitler. Show some respect!!!1!!
Hitler took away the greatest prize of WWII so Russia could not have it and frankly that’s a monumental disgrace that he did that
The title of “the guy who killed Hitler” is now a moot reward
deleted by creator
I find that a fundamentally ridiculous point of view, that human life is something so valuable that, paradoxically, no amount of human lives ended could ever justify wishing death on someone, but props for consistency, I guess.
deleted by creator
That presumes that wishing for someone’s death dehumanizes them.
Created an example and a precedent that rulership is not a shield against punishment? Removed a vile human being from existence? Avenged the literal millions of helpless innocents he ordered slaughtered?
Death is often a viable solution. Oftentimes more viable than the alternatives.
All other options having failed, sometimes that means they’re no longer breathing.
I just love (/s) how tone is policed harder than literal stochastic terrorism from the right.
They can tolerate killing people, but they draw the line at uncivil words!
(Unless of course those uncivil words are said towards the people being killed, then they conveniently didn’t hear them.)
Hard to rule when you are dead. Thats probably the reason why people cheer and not for the death itself.