• CaptObvious
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        You don’t understand why an ad company owning a “privacy focused” browser is a problem?

          • off_brand_@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Do you? Genuinely, not trying to snark. I see this point lots, but Im skeptical that people actually do.

            As a dev, I read plenty of commits, and the idea of voluntarily prodding through commits on a FOSS project is just not happening. I’d rather just trust the dev, and the community to pick through the code in my place. The obvious issue being, what if everyone also does that.

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              In fact, sometimes! Sometimes I check GitHub’s difference between tags and open commits with commit summaries too vague on the first page. Yeah, it’s pretty much just a basic scan, but since it’s open source I don’t think they’ll be brave enough to do things too nefarious and hidden, which like the bystander effect you’ve said, I feel like will come to light anyway. Hell, someone somehow managed to find furry porn in Thorium.

        • Kissaki@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          The relevant, 2023-07-03:

          I am happy to say that Waterfox is independent again.