• @barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Let’s flip this around: Show me a thing that Meta has touched that hasn’t turned to shit. Why risk the same fate when we don’t have to? What is meta bringing to the table that would warrant foolhardiness on our part?

    See the opposite of FUD is naivete, hubris, make-believe, not something one wants to be engaged in either.

    • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      Huh, if only there was an example of Meta existing on a decentralized platform where I could choose to visit them and interact with their stuff but I didn’t have to.

      Oh huh, would you look at that, turns out this little decentralized network called the worldwide web has been running it this whole time!

      • @Trarmp@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        That’s a pretty good example actually. React has been a boon to webdev imo, and I love using it. Yarn too.

        • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          But in the scenario of lemmy / mastodon, you only ever interact with your chosen frontend / instance and it only communivates to facebook through activitypub not through the general web standards. Even if facebook were to just embed a bunch of js code as an activitypub text feed, your chosen instance would still have to choose whether or not to render it by default, or to give you the option, or to block it entirely.

          • @Trarmp@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            It’s like people don’t want to email people with Gmail addresses because Google at some point killed off XMPP*, in fearing that email altogether would be killed off.

            • which it didn’t even do, XMPP was a terrible protocol by itself already.