“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., on Sunday wouldn’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results during an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

While interviewing Stefanik, who serves in House Republican leadership, host Kristen Welker asked, “Would you vote to certify, and will you vote to certify, the results of the 2024 election no matter what they show?”

Stefanik, who has boosted former President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, said that she did not vote to certify the 2020 results in the state of Pennsylvania and several other states because there were “unconstitutional acts circumventing the state legislature and unilaterally changing election law.”

  • DragonTypeWyvern
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, she wasn’t whether she will certify it if “she doesnt like the results.”

    The exact question she was asked is even in the excerpt.

    Maybe you should read it.

    • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Kind of ironic, more when the question is written there.

      “Would you vote to certify the 2024 election, no matter what they show”

      Maybe it is you who cannot comprehend what you read.

      • DragonTypeWyvern
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Uh huh.

        And, Great Minds, why would anyone say yes unequivocally before an election that hasn’t happened and might have actual fraud in it?

        • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Dur, are you that dumb or what ? Even If you don’t like the results, you have to accept them. That is the whole issue about it.

          It is not a matter of a toddler wanting another toy, it is a politician. I know that you and that idiot also have the mental capacity of a toddler but without restrictions. Even if you don’t like the result you have to accept it.

          • DragonTypeWyvern
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I really need to stop trying to explain the obvious to idiots.

            • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Why, did your mirror broke?

              Still that you do not understand something so easy is really showing how much of an idiot you are.

              Even if that person doesn’t like the result, or thr maga moronic cult, they have to accept the result, like it or not.

                  • DragonTypeWyvern
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Actually, I’m an anarchosyndicalist, and it wasn’t an attempt to refute anything.

                    It was just a brief statement mocking someone I knew wouldn’t understand it, because they’re a circle jerking liberal with a brain the size of a peanut and the situational comprehension to match.