“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., on Sunday wouldn’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results during an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

While interviewing Stefanik, who serves in House Republican leadership, host Kristen Welker asked, “Would you vote to certify, and will you vote to certify, the results of the 2024 election no matter what they show?”

Stefanik, who has boosted former President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, said that she did not vote to certify the 2020 results in the state of Pennsylvania and several other states because there were “unconstitutional acts circumventing the state legislature and unilaterally changing election law.”

  • DragonTypeWyvern
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I really need to stop trying to explain the obvious to idiots.

    • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why, did your mirror broke?

      Still that you do not understand something so easy is really showing how much of an idiot you are.

      Even if that person doesn’t like the result, or thr maga moronic cult, they have to accept the result, like it or not.

          • DragonTypeWyvern
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Actually, I’m an anarchosyndicalist, and it wasn’t an attempt to refute anything.

            It was just a brief statement mocking someone I knew wouldn’t understand it, because they’re a circle jerking liberal with a brain the size of a peanut and the situational comprehension to match.

            • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Nah, more like a conservative idiot.

              Sure you couldn’t refute a thing, you lack the capacity to give an actual good argument.

              Lol, said by an idiot who has the reading comprehension of a toddler hahahahaj the irony.

              But again, only an idiot would think that one person can just skip their functions of their job, just because they didn’t like the results. That is how stupid you are.

              • DragonTypeWyvern
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                😆

                Stop bro, you’ve already proved me right, you don’t have to keep talking!

                • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  In what? That you are a conservative snowflake? And idiot? And that you cannot even comprehend what you read? Or that you have the restraint of a toddler?