@fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agoNYPD faces backlash as it prepares to encrypt radio communications | New York | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up1495arrow-down112cross-posted to: thepoliceproblem@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1483arrow-down1external-linkNYPD faces backlash as it prepares to encrypt radio communications | New York | The Guardianwww.theguardian.com@fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square130fedilinkcross-posted to: thepoliceproblem@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
minus-square@lolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoI’d much rather have some real accountability measures than the accidental accountability occasionally provided by broadcasting their communications.
minus-square@Krauerking@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglish6•6 months agoHow about both? The governmental systems are supposed to be open so that they can be observed to be truthful and trustworthy, and then keep checking anyways.
minus-square@lolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-26 months agoI don’t think things like names of suspects or victims should be made public.
minus-square@thecrotch@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoFine, roll that out before you take away what we have
I’d much rather have some real accountability measures than the accidental accountability occasionally provided by broadcasting their communications.
How about both? The governmental systems are supposed to be open so that they can be observed to be truthful and trustworthy, and then keep checking anyways.
I don’t think things like names of suspects or victims should be made public.
Fine, roll that out before you take away what we have