“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • GodlessCommie
    link
    fedilink
    -97 months ago

    Still better then genocide. You and your fellow cohorts would be in an uproar if the exact same thing was happening if a republican was in the WH. You don’t care about people’s lives, only the one doing the killing

      • GodlessCommie
        link
        fedilink
        -27 months ago

        I said nothing about supporting trump, I said oppose Biden. But Biden does happen to be the largest recipient of JStreet money

          • GodlessCommie
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            Instead of voters punching left, they should be making demands of the DNC to replace Biden.

            • @Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              How do you plan to convince people to do that? What strategy would you employ?

              Talk is cheap. Idealogues like you are glib to demand change, but y’all never have a viable plan to get there.

              • GodlessCommie
                link
                fedilink
                -3
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                We do have viable plans, but have to fight fucking shitlibs 24/7 that are convinced it’s their way or nothing. Your way doesn’t work

                • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  Is your way any different though? It seems you’re just as convinced it’s your way or nothing. If the tables were turned, and a bunch of liberals were refusing to vote for a communist incumbent unless they had more neoliberal policy, would you agree that the communists should compromise?

                  Everyone’s self assured of their path being the righteous one. What actually makes them different though is if you’re willing to do the same if the tables are turned. If you aren’t, then why should you expect the same of your opponent?

                  • GodlessCommie
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -27 months ago

                    There should be NO compromise with anything or any party that prefers capital over people. Democrats claim to support marginalized communities then vote for politicians that enact laws against the marginalized. Which translates to you dont have our back other than for social clout. I trust someone that hates me to my face over someone that does it covertly

    • @CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      “Me and my cohorts” you seem to know who I am. Why dont you tell me about myself, and I can explain a “false dichotomy” to you.

    • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -27 months ago

      You and your fellow cohorts would be in an uproar if the exact same thing was happening if a republican was in the WH.

      You’re making it obvious that you have a double-standard and are simply projecting that.

      • GodlessCommie
        link
        fedilink
        -17 months ago

        There’s no double standard, your comment makes the assumption I advocate for a Republican

        • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          There’s no double standard, your comment makes the assumption I advocate for a Republican

          I made no such assumption. But considering how quickly you jumped on this despite me not saying, it’s clear how much you were intentionally baiting it.

          Projecting and not arguing in good faith. Probably should be obvious from your name that you’re just a bad troll.