• TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 months ago

    Robbery does require violence though.

    • @hersh
      link
      27 months ago

      This probably depends on jurisdiction. I also suspect “violence” in a legal sense is different from the everyday sense. I’m not a lawyer.

      From the US FBI’s web site:

      The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program defines robbery as the taking or attempting to take anything of value from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or threat of force or violence and/or by putting the victim in fear.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        Yes I did gloss over the “threat of violence” part and just included it in general as “violence”.

    • @charliespider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Does it? Quietly hand a note to the bank teller that says: “this is a robbery, put $10000 in a bag”, then calmly walk out when they give it to you.

      One could argue that there was violence implied, but that doesn’t mean that violence was used.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        Yeah the threat of violence makes it robbery (eg if you have a banana in your pocket but say you have a gun), just like terrorism can be either violence or the threat of violence to achieve a political goal. However, a bank heist would not be robbery, just like burglary or pickpocketing is not robbery.