• TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      Robbery does require violence though.

      • @hersh
        link
        27 months ago

        This probably depends on jurisdiction. I also suspect “violence” in a legal sense is different from the everyday sense. I’m not a lawyer.

        From the US FBI’s web site:

        The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program defines robbery as the taking or attempting to take anything of value from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or threat of force or violence and/or by putting the victim in fear.

        • TWeaK
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Yes I did gloss over the “threat of violence” part and just included it in general as “violence”.

      • @charliespider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        Does it? Quietly hand a note to the bank teller that says: “this is a robbery, put $10000 in a bag”, then calmly walk out when they give it to you.

        One could argue that there was violence implied, but that doesn’t mean that violence was used.

        • TWeaK
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Yeah the threat of violence makes it robbery (eg if you have a banana in your pocket but say you have a gun), just like terrorism can be either violence or the threat of violence to achieve a political goal. However, a bank heist would not be robbery, just like burglary or pickpocketing is not robbery.