• @sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    779 months ago

    The notion that free* healthcare, free* education, subsidised transport, government provided unemployment supports etc is even labelled “socialist” strikes me as particularly American.

    • @Usul_00_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      Having lived for quite a long time in canada, I think most Americans would love the it.

      Semi related - The USA is already socialist if you consider they have more spent per capita on healthcare, and pay for things like roads, police, fire departments, schools and the like. On the last point, they pay all the way through High School and then significantly subsidize universities as well. It’s all a matter of degree. In the usa, we socialize on many fronts, and then pay companies more than we would pay to socialize the same service and consider that better. Imo, it’s very much not.

      • @Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        189 months ago

        I’m not sure if spending more per capita means “socialize” healthcare. Isn’t the problem with US healthcare is that “accessing healthcare at any time without the worry of financial burden” is not currently true for everyone?

        • @Usul_00_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          49 months ago

          I think your definition is a fine one. I think the Nuance I was trying to make and perhaps did poorly was that the US already pays a huge amount for healthcare but we pay it to companies to do research that they then use to make profit worldwide. Not to provide services for everyone. It’s a matter of priority

      • Zerlyna
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        Don’t forget the farmers who are subsidized.

      • @Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        Support is also a strut.

        But if you’re getting healthcare and unemployment that would be two supports that most Americans don’t get. The plural for support is supports isn’t it?

        • @themusicman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -69 months ago

          That meaning of support is a non-countable noun, like water or happiness (or Lego, but lots of people get that one wrong). There is no plural of non-countable nouns.

          You might use (for example) “bodies of water”, “levels of happiness”, “pieces of Lego”, or “sources of support” etc.

          • @DragonTypeWyvern
            link
            5
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Silence, bot, the only thing worse than a pedant is one that isn’t even correct.

            • @tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              One thing I’m not loving about going from reddit to lemmy is the amount of pedantry by people stuck somewhere between A and B on this graph.

              Never heard of linguistics or prestige dialects, just go around parroting nitpicks they learned in 7th grade grammar classes.