Underrated comment, power that sits unused will get preyed on.

I believe they are referring to the fact there is not a single moral bone within the Disney corporation unless as an act when doing so is the most optimal path to obtain mo’ money.

This is the TLDR if i ever get to put the whole thing on paper

I omitting some details here because to big of a topic for a comment:

• perceive “loss” as the measurement of things that get destroyed and cannot be reversed. Disconnect it from economic win/loss balances for now,

• observe how our society is creating huge amounts of loss worldwide, natural resources are being destroyed, people are getting exploited living below their potential.

• realise that life is inherently a destructive action and that our society will always create loss to continue to exists.

• accept that in this measurement all life forms have a negative balance, comparable to the ecological footprint

• create industries and businesses that focus on creating a stable outputs for the least loss.

• distribution centers formed from current local small government ally to these new industries and can agree for a portion of the output based on the amount of people they serve and the self reported needs they have.

distribution centers pay with fountain pen money which is the system governments and banks use today to keep making new loans. It is essentially just paper money. Where we now sustain it by paying old loans back (often with new fountain pen money) in this system we simply hold a record of the economic debt creates.

Distribution centers know the needs of the population through online forms that list all the resources and stuff they have acces to. In a few rounds people choose what and how much they need (reasonable limit based on data) if demand is high the policy is to first re package in smaller portions to meet demand, or if no fair distribution can be archived to not distribute that good at all. (Skipping so much detail here)

• these goods are essentially free, but the loss gets recorded, think of it as getting an infinite loan allowing you an unconditional negative balance to guarantee you a proper life on the world you live today without requiring us to solve sustainability for the long term future first. Also with the wastefullness of the current system, you’re not making a dent.

• in the first stage the loss can be calculated as economic money all input resources costs as the resources will probably be bought from the current economy. The result of the cost calculation and the calculation formulas itself must be fully transparent, loss calculation is also purely additive, you cant do an action that somehow revert what got lost. Profits need to be considered their own form of loss, measured transparently beside it (the only distinction is that you can lower cost price simply by not hoarding profit while resource ingredients always contribute a fixed loss)

What is now “price of a product” becomes a reliable calculation where these industries can be properly compared to each other based on input/output and total cost all in ratio to each-other.

This is why i titled this concept “rational economy”

This economy would start small with a few products (outputs of the first ones), acces should start equally small, think hospitals, nursing homes.

You would in a transition scenario have a system where, the normal world economy is still there, but vulnerable people get acces to a second type of store that does not require payment, adjusts itself based on demand and is transparency designed to measure the exact impact loss it costs to sustain.

This is why a subtitled this concept “an arrogant retirement plan for gen z” and why its relevant to the post.

For the record i am not gen z and consider myself too old to ever see this stage. But if we start now then by the time gen z is old they may become the first post scarcity consumers.

No i am unwilling to answer the question about all the plot holes above, i have to ommit so much nuance just to type this out. Just tell me if you think it be valuable if i Finnish my book about this or not.

My first interpretation of vibe coding was to code for fun and personal enjoyment without worrying about industry standards or deployability. More often see with self-taught youth.

I felt like i have been doing this for years before ai became a thing.

Minor counter point.

Killing nazis still implies the existence of living nazis. I wouldn’t say there is “nothing wrong”.

The fact modern people can still grow up to be nazis remains a huge problem of our combined society, regardless if we apply a post-solution or not.

It is my sincerest hope that sometime in the future humanity will mature and outgrow fascist and other harmful ideas entirely.

We need to split clients from providers.

Invidious and freetube could diversify to accept multiple alternative sources besides youtube content.

If the content exists on multiple platforms the user could set a preference and orded or backup providers.

As creators make a switch to smaller platforms the users who use these clients are unaffected. It works similar to our fediverse, a community can just change instance and everyone can still access it the same.

Creators could test migration by posting to multiple providers themselves. Those reliant on YouTube money specifically could premiere on youtube and after some time reupload elsewhere.

Those that dont rely on youtube money can do the reverse where the later youtube upload serves more as an ad to their alternative main channel.

That last part is what they need to understand.

If you need help you can ask for it. You need room to grow your own experience. You need experience to easier handle situations where help is not available.

If your mom is reasonable, maybe you can discuss a code or symbol(s) that indicates you’re not ok and need help. Your request is that she does not step in if she sees you suffer, so you can more peacefully overcome the challenge.

I don’t know your dorm policies and for me a personal one really was a must. But that didn’t mean i never had people sleep over or slept over at a friend. If your old enough to live at dorm then your mom doesn’t need to know this. You are entitled to private sections of your life.

Aunt is just awkward, maybe text the guy straightforward “Hey are you aware my aunt is trying to get us dating?” Just so you are on the same baseline and its only awkward towards the aunt.

Also a guess, isn’t a hand or any biological form not also the result of a mathematical pattern?

I do see how ai could replicate “a” blur but what it might not be able to do (yet) is replicate the unique blur of a specific device.

So maybe you couldn’t proof something is AI, but the physical lens as proof that it is not.

Not really, the prospect of getting my own computer at all brought immense excitement and i didn’t know what words like “operating system” and “software” even meant.

I can imagine it though since i got comfortable with using the terminal, a gui feels more and more like bloat.

As much as this can be a privacy issue couldn’t this be a feature to tell apart ai and real photos?

My first pc had windows 95 and it was indeed vastly better then todays corporate shite

Jokes on you, being an adult white male still doesn’t exclude you from being attacked.

Its maybe halfway getting there but you also need to make sure you are not queer, not emphatic to others and above all rich.

Depends on definitions really.

Online pedo has a low bar ans seems to mean anyone who has any sexual thoughts directed to a factual minor.

Irl you have a distinction between attraction and acting, also between children en teenagers.

Plenty of sick fucks who are into power and general taboo but are not actually attracted to minors themselves specifically. That list is going to have plenty of people like that.

Vs

Non acting actual pedophiles that are moral citizens privately dealing with a sex disorder. They are just as likely to demand justice as the rest of us.

This comment exists for technical reasons only

deleted by creator

Geopolitical bunny speaks the truth and has become a new addition to the haunthings in my dreams.

Whats the difference between expecting and predicting here?

BH was theoretical at first. The new breakthrough was empirical evidence.

How are you certain there are no undiscovered fundamental particles involved to quantum gravity and dark matter?