• 6 Posts
  • 328 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle



  • This is a good explanation because it gets at the source. L. Ron was a failed Freudian and had some mental issues of his own, he lashed out at the psychiatry community, and built this whole thing out of a hatred for what (rightfully) rejected him. He just happened to write shitty sci-fi, so he channeled that into pseudo-psychiatry (Dianetics). There’s a reason those e-meters exist: bullshit stress response devices to measure “clearing” certain negative thoughts. They don’t actually work, but that’s the principle: you have a “auditing session,” and let’s say you get asked about your propensity for lying in a certain situation. E-meter response is measured until you’re no longer stressed by the thing you were asked about (according to the meter), you pay them absurd amounts of money, they now have dirt on you in case you try to leave, etc. This is its core, reductively. Anti-psychiatry money mill.













  • Here’s what happened to me before the ACA: I started grad school at ange 22 in a state where my parents’ coverage didn’t work, and therefore had to buy into the school plan through Blue Cross (may they forever burn in hell). For an entire year, I paid for all medical care out of pocket PLUS paid for an insurance plan, so that after a year Blue Cross would go “ok, I guess you paid enough to get on our plan for next year.” This is to say nothing of the ensuing years spent fighting tooth and fucking nail with Blue Cross over literally every medical decision my providers made. Absolutely nothing went without needing an appeal or a peer-to-peer due to “pre-existing condition.” The ACA made some of this easier, but Blue Cross figured out they could do stuff like drop drug coverage from their formulary to “pass on savings,” which brought back the need to do peer-to-peer on literally everything to get a high-copay “formulary exemption,” etc. It’s going to be a nightmare you can’t possibly imagine.



  • Bruce Bond is great, and any of his numbered “Fables” are particularly good. When I teach poetry, I like to take the approach with a triangle of form, content, and meaning. Then the most straightforward thing to do is see how a poem matches tradition/expectations at each point, and how it subverts tradition/expectations. Calling it a “fable” immediately draws the questions of what a fable is, the history of fables, how they operate, their purpose and commonalities, and then how this poem both fits in the tradition of fables but also subverts it. That’s where you could crack into the meaning portion, academically speaking.

    Also, sometimes poems are just awesome little pieces of writing, and that’s why I like them too.