I feel like the important difference between an intelligent human and an AI is that the AI can be replicated easily whereas we are yet to be able to clone a human with their memories. Imagine if we added a restriction to AI training in that only 1 copy of the model can ever be run at a time, like a human. In that situation, all the trouble with copyright would go away.

Share link to learn more?

Are you saying that the mere existence of the option of using a non open source license invalidate the provisions in the open source option? That is, if they offered only AGPL, they would be oss but if they offer your choice of AGPL and something non oss, the AGPL option would no longer be oss too? The article you linked does not address this as far as I can tell.

Principal investigator.

We may claim the ideal that every life is equal, it is probably not how we actually feel.

Are warehouse owners analogous to AI companies here? I don’t think AI companies care about their models being misused unless it has economic impact whereas warehouse owners certainly care about their wares being stolen regardless of how those wares are then used or how dangerous they are.

Everyone in the hotel shifts two rooms down. Sis and boulder take rooms 1 and 2, now empty, respectively.

What is that personal take?

Is this normal? I take it you dont normally have to take this many readings in order to administer daily?

Key word there is “evolve” which may be reasonable with respect to natural evolution of flight but then even human assisted artificial selection operates much more efficiently than that.

These are “non-enforcable” in some states.

I’m the 3.9%, twice.