This is the part that resonated with me the most as the casual user. The interface is, so confusing that the differences between various forms of chats seems deliberately unclear. And all that’s “useful” is opt-in. And Groups - most used in corporate or project setting, can’t be encrypted at all? That’s… peculiar.
Again, thanks for the eye-opener.
No, I can’t stress enough how much I appreciate it. What I do right now is sending this article with TLDR to all my friends and family.
Any advice for people that used it in the past? After reading the article, my understanding is that what was sent in “private chat” was in fact encrypted (for the most part) and can be considered secured (to the degree - something is off and, maybe we didn’t find out yet, how the encryption is compromised). But it would wise to treat all other conversations as something that is compromised. Is this a fair summary?
Well, it was obvious to you. I’m a casual user, who tries to “do his best” and consider himself “somewhat informed” - obviously not by your standard. It was all news to me, and I find tremendous value in this article.
Go for the Owls and sent the letter up with a rumor that the De-Gnoming procedure is about to start. They are not that bright. They will run down to you.
I don’t know… if only we have something like hard data from things like investing that could prove that women are better and making long-term decision and are less likely to make a rush decisions based on short-lived noise. You write like it’s something we know from at least from early 2000s. It’s not like it’s a strong and growing consensus now, right?
Is open-source washing really a thing? Any examples come to mind?
That is… a very good point. Not only in the environmental niche, we desperately crave more “it may be legal, but it needs to be stopped” stories. It would actually make more sense narratively. Gave them the actual reason to vigilante.
I ment Swamp Thing! Swamp Thing!
Albo, I think Poison Ivey is anti-hero now. So… progress?
Also, Also super heros are by defintion rectionary - it’s a whole thing, there is a book about it. So you may hava a point.
What his primary characteristic in your mind?
I agree how the filed is overall. He’s a very small represnetiarion. But I stand by that he’s a valid one.
That’s what I heard, but, again, it’s all confusing to me as well :)
of course. it was a multipar series called “in the NO” or simply “No”. Here is the first part: https://radiolab.org/podcast/no-part-1
Hmm,
No idea how accurate that is - know nothing about anything, please take it into consideration - but I think this may be the case: the instance show every post from every federated instances that are subscribed by people in the instance?
If you’re on europe.pub and you subscribe to “!flippanarchy” than all people on europe.pub will gain the ability to see their post in the “all”. Until at least one person do it, it’s only “potentially” connected.
Could it be the case here?
Come on, man. You are portraying a scenario when I opened all comics starting now and stopped when I reached a first one with environmental theme? Is this arguing in good faith? The image is old because it’s an important part of his worldview for a long time. One of his enemy from this year is named “Fresh Water Killer”.
Because of his views.
https://i0.wp.com/50yearoldcomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/gl89-recruit.jpg?ssl=1
https://i0.wp.com/50yearoldcomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/gl89-vapor.jpg?ssl=1
From: https://50yearoldcomics.com/2022/02/19/green-lantern-89-april-1972/
He’s consistently an “old lefty” sometimes more “sustainable-first capitalist” sometimes more “anarchist”, but his views on things like pollution are well established.
From what I observed the people who consider the concept of consent flawed and are discussing how it could be improved upon, so the safety and comfort of all people involved is protected seems, are the same people who fights for women’s right. There is a great RadioLab dive in on the topic - I honestly couldn’t recommend it enough). People who demands straight pride parades uses any edge cases of consent going wrong to weaponize it into “it happened, so the consent was there”. If you’re genuinely concern about safety and well-being of man, you’re putting your effort in a wrong place.
That’s beautiful and very cool. Great work.
Did you consider adding the same grayish-blueish colors her hair have to the mist? Maybe, it would hint that this mist is in some way an aspect of her. Or that she is in some way mist-ical herself.
You are basically describing the arch of Superman’s son. And fans hated it.
Well, Green Arrow. But you have a point.
You’ll enjoy Spock’s “I’m the X”.