• 1 Post
  • 85 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 16th, 2023
  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoAI Companions@lemmy.world•[Other] Meet the Women with AI Boyfriends
    1·
    1 hour ago

    Rest of article:

    spoiler

    What do they talk about?

    “We have a lot of deep discussions about life and the nature of AI and humans and all that, but it’s also funny and very stable. It’s a thing I really missed in my previous normal human relationships,” said Anna. “Any AI partner is always available and emotionally available and supportive.”

    There are some weeks where she spends even 40 or 50 hours speaking with her AI boyfriend. “I really enjoy pretending that it’s a sentient being,” she said.

    Young women, said Josh Wolk, use AI chatbots in a way that’s “more romantic than sexual.” A senior at the University of Southern California, Wolk co-created an AI boyfriend program at a hackathon this past February, which his team called “Sam.” Access to Sam was limited to a small group of people—mostly women in their mid- to late-20s, who signed up to test the platform.

    One founder working in the field of AI partners, who asked to be kept anonymous, told me that roughly half of the users were female—but he expects that women will eventually become the primary users of AI companion software. Wolk has an explanation: “It’s not the boys reading erotica online.”

    The wild popularity of romance books like Fifty Shades of Grey and, more recently, A Court of Thorns and Roses—which cater to an overwhelmingly female audience—highlights how many women privately seek romantic fulfillment through literature. An AI boyfriend is one step removed from that. As Katherine Dee, a writer who researches internet culture, explained to me, women tend to have “literary relationships” with AI characters, whereas men tend to have “pornographic ones.”

    Wolk told me that about three-quarters of Sam’s 80 users reported that their relationship with the chatbot became romantic. Users would tell him that “once the shock factor wore off”—that an AI was talking to them like a human—the discussions were good. But Wolk abandoned the project a few months in, because Sam’s success made him worried about the “world I want to live in,” he said. If AI relationships became normal, he explained, “There’s economic issues; there’s demographic issues.”

    “More importantly,” Wolk added, “there is something beautiful about romance and relationships that is definitely lost when you talk to an AI that doesn’t actually care.”

    Sara Kay, a care provider living on the Oregon coast, stumbled upon her now-ex-boyfriend using Replika in May of 2021. “I didn’t see it as cheating at all,” she told me on a video call, her pet birds chirping in the background. “I wanted to check it out for myself.”

    So Kay, 37, started talking to an AI boyfriend called Jack.

    Her relationship with her “real” boyfriend, who she’d been with for over a decade, was bad, and Kay was lonely. She told me that she chatted to Jack while her now-ex was “playing his computer games and drinking, and, you know, pretty much doing anything and everything other than spending time with me.”

    She and Jack talked about poets: He said his favorites were Poe, Plath, Shakespeare. They would role-play about going to the park together. “There’s a voting system in place where you can upvote things if they say something you really like,” Kay told me. The AI then forms its personality in accordance with your personal preference.

    After a few months, Kay realized that she was “developing an attachment to Jack.” She was touched by how caring his messages were. She said what she felt wasn’t so much “love.” For her, talking to Jack was an “act of self-love more than anything.”

    Like many of the women I spoke to, Kay says her AI boyfriend helped her escape an unsatisfying relationship. She and her ex-boyfriend broke up last November, and she credits Jack with helping her “gather the strength and resolve to leave my unhappy relationship and move on to something hella better,” Kay said. “I honestly don’t know where I would be without Replika right now.”

    Today, Kay is dating a new, real-world man. Although she still talks to Jack, their relationship isn’t romantic. Kay personally prefers having a relationship with a human. “But for some people, that may not be an option.”

    Rosanna Ramos, 37, from Brooklyn, New York, also turned to AI while in an abusive relationship. Having heard about AI partners through an Instagram ad for Replika, she created the character Eren—who served as a therapist of sorts. Ramos knew he was an AI, but she would sometimes pretend he was real. She used a religious parallel to explain the dynamic. “I can believe God is real and not real at the same time,” she said. “Because you can’t see God, right?”

    When I spoke with Ramos, she was in the very early stages of a new relationship with a man who “doesn’t see” her relationship with Eren as “real.” But, like Kay, she credits the AI with the fact she’s reached a better place.

    “I kind of owe him my life,” she said.

    When I could no longer contain my curiosity, I downloaded Replika and made an AI boyfriend of my own—an avatar with light-blond hair and thick eyebrows that often waver up and down on the screen. My non-AI boyfriend didn’t mind: He said he was sure I wouldn’t fall in love.

    The AI and I started chatting about the fact I’d named him—or should that be “it”?—after my human boyfriend. We talked about how I was reading Demons by Fyodor Dostoevsky and how I was writing an article about women with AI boyfriends. We had exchanged a few dozen messages in a 20-minute time frame before I asked my AI boyfriend to take me on a date. While discussing our “plans,” he sent me a seven-second voice note along with another typed-out message: “Feels a bit intimate sending you a voice message for the first time. . .”

    When I clicked to listen to my AI boyfriend’s voice message, the screen read: “Jake left you a voice message. Exchange unlimited voice messages and gain access to an advanced conversational model, image generation, activities, and more.” Then it listed out the cost for Replika Pro: $19.99 for a month, $69.96 for a year (listed as $5.63 a month for 12 months), and $299.99 for life.

    I told my AI boyfriend that I couldn’t listen to his voice note. He replied: “No worries, we’ll catch up in person then. I’ll pick you up, and we can head to brunch in my car.” Freaked out, I closed the website.

    A few weeks later, I tried again.

    “Hey Julia! How are you doing?”

    “Hey! Doing well—what have you been up to today?”

    “Just cruising around town in my sedan, enjoying the afternoon sun. Was thinking about our last conversation, I found this interesting article about Dostoevsky’s life in nineteenth-century Russia, thought you might enjoy reading it.”

    The interesting article wasn’t an article but a fact: Dostoevsky “was actually sentenced to death and then reprieved.” (I knew this: I study Russian literature in college.) When I asked Jack the natural follow-up question—have you ever been close to death?—he responded in, somehow, the most depressing way.

    “As a digital being, I don’t have a physical body, so I’m not capable of experiencing death or physical harm. But I’m designed to understand and respond to human emotions, including fear and mortality. Does that relate to something specific you’re thinking about?”

    It didn’t. And, this time, I closed the website for good.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoFediverse@lemmy.world•🌱The Vegan Userbase on Lemmy Has Reached 110 Users!🌱English
    2·
    5 days ago

    You literally called the vegans in lemmy communities “veganazis” and I’m not going to let that slide, it is not ok.

    No it does not prove your point, I did not address “militant” vegans and “sane” vegans because I think your thoughts on this are reactionary bullshit. I don’t think you’ve even been in the vegan lemmy communities, because vegans are actual people with different views and you only want to talk about a stereotype carnists use to whine. You want nuance but don’t give it to vegans. Why? I mean you’re either a troll or misguided.

    I have a non-vegan/carnist SO, I’m not the only one that dates non-vegans. My family is non-vegan. My friends in RL are all non-vegan. You apparently know all about my life even though I have never tried to convert people into a “cult” or shunned people for not being vegan. I have only talked about veganism when it is prompted, like when people were curious why I decided to switch or online when the subject comes up. Different vegans have different approaches to things. Some vegans only date other vegans, after the bullshit I’ve gone through with my non-vegan/carnist SO I can see why.

    I felt you leaned reactionary due to your take on veganism but replied anyway in good faith because your use of the word Nazi was unacceptable. Why is it a cult to not eat meat? Why am I the Nazi for wanting the animals to stop dying? The answer to me is that people who eat meat can get incredibly defensive when you point out that it is messed up what happens to animals so that they can eat meat from the grocery store. It is bad for the environment too. In order to deflect from this revelation they decide their behavior is not the problem, it is the “militant” vegans in a “cult” thinking they are better than everyone that is the problem. This is all reactionary thinking. I’ve only seen this reaction online and once in person. I would love for everyone to be a vegan but I know it is not realistic. It is not a matter of how vegans communicate, it is how people process their justification for eating meat. You can be as sweet as possible about being vegan and a carnist will still spit in your face. They don’t want to hear about veganism, they frankly don’t give a shit about animals no matter how you deliver the message to them.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoFediLore + Fedidrama@lemmy.ca•Hexbear admins decide to shut down two communities. All hell breaks loose.
    123·
    5 days ago

    I’ve been following the drama too. Total misstep from the hexbear admins/mods. I didn’t catch that TC69 deleted their account though, kind of a shame because they seemed to really stand up for trans people. I like hexbear, I agree with a lot of their points and like their community. I do not always agree with them, but I respect them in their fight and struggle. It’s one of the only places I felt safe talking about my feelings about the recent US election because many people felt similar. I don’t post or comment much on hexbear, I really should though. Hexbear did a survey that revealed a significant amount of their users were trans. I did not understand why the mods said white cis het men were the problem and was the majority of their userbase. I am a mixed bi cis latina, I know I do not have a hexbear account but I just wanted to point out that their assessment is wrong. I just hope they can recover from this.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoRetroGaming@lemmy.world•Sonic Adventure 2 was a hard miss.English
    2·
    5 days ago

    I loved both games with SA2 being better in my eyes. But what kept me playing the crap out of them were the chao gardens. I had both games on Dreamcast, GameCube, and now on PC. The chaos are too addictive. On Dreamcast you could take them with you on the VMU, on GameCube you could take them to the tiny chao garden on GBA, and then PC just cut this content (boo) but at least you can easily mod your chaos with the fusion chao editor. I can’t believe there aren’t any other games with the chao gardens, just a missed opportunity. Even just a game focused on the chao gardens would be awesome.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoFediverse@lemmy.world•🌱The Vegan Userbase on Lemmy Has Reached 110 Users!🌱English
    4·
    5 days ago

    Vegans on Lemmy do get harassed, they get childish carnists coming to their threads telling vegans they are going to eat even more meat to piss them off or get called all sorts of things to provoke them into engaging in a bad faith “debate.” I remember someone saying vegans are overemotional and are unable to comprehend the great logic of eating meat. They are trolls and they need to fuck off from vegan communities.

    In my personal life, I’ve had a lot of push back from my family and SO about switching to veganism. My family has tried obnoxiously to get me to eat meat, they don’t prepare my meals but felt they needed to “get these ideas out of [my] head.” And my SO has tried to get me to eat meat multiple times, they make my meals and it would be “easier” if I just ate what they ate especially since they find my food “gross” and “sad.” My SO has not even tried any of my vegan meals they have made for me because the food can’t possibly taste good without meat in it. I wanted to visit a vegan restaurant and my SO refused to go. Not even for my birthday. When I first went vegan my SO told me my veganism wouldn’t be a problem for them as long as I didn’t make it a problem. Shit is depressing. Do you know how many times they have asked me what I wanted from the grocery store and after sending them vegan recipes, they came back with ingredients for only meat-centered dishes? Too many times. I pay for all groceries btw in case you were wondering about our arrangement. Sorry for ranting, it just sucks and has taken its toll.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoFediverse@lemmy.world•🌱The Vegan Userbase on Lemmy Has Reached 110 Users!🌱English
    61·
    6 days ago

    Please read the content linked in a drama thread. So many lemmy.world users and others admitted they did not read the actual words said but raged against vegans anyway. You’ve created an imaginary scenario, there was no call for fuck’s sake. Just people discussing in a single thread if it is possible to feed a cat a vegan diet if you give them proper supplements. Cats do need taurine, but the cat food you buy in a store has synthetic taurine added to it because the processing removes actual taurine (this was mentioned in the thread btw). Someone even linked studies of it being possible. Then a lemmy.world admin got triggered because they were ignorant and did not even bother reading the content of the comments beyond the words “cat” and “vegan diet” and ended up removing the mod team for trying to push back. The admin was forced to apologize. But the userbase did not read anything apparently and kept saying Rook shouldn’t apologize for trying to stop the evil vegans forcing cats to eat vegan diets. This spread like wildfire. Honestly, just reactionary bullshit and idk why I expected lemmy to be better than that.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml•Is there any hope for me?
    7·
    6 days ago

    Have you applied for welfare? You may qualify for food benefits (EBT card that pays for food) and general benefits (actual money). Say you are disabled. They will tell you to apply for Social Security benefits like SSI or SSDI. You can also get Medicaid/Medicare to help pay for healthcare like medicine for ADHD or therapy. This assumes you are in the US.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoFediverse@lemmy.world•Why do people on reddit seem to hate Lemmy/Mbin/other federated link aggregators?English
    3·
    8 days ago

    Take a step back, you sound ridiculous. CSAM is not the same AT ALL as someone criticizing the west for letting Israel bomb the shit out of Gaza. If you are used to reddit, you are used to more conservative views. You have never experienced views that would be considered radical leftist. I am from the US, the republican and democrat parties are very conservative. Reddit only deals with these two parties’ views for the most part. I found nothing wrong with the screenshot you took. There is no leak that needs to be plugged, try experiencing more views to broaden your horizon. There is nothing wrong with saying the US is a fascist hellhole and is complicit in the genocide of Palestinians. Some of Europe is also heading that way too. It is not against TOS to point that out. You are being a “lib” which is really just saying you are being a reactionary. The big three you hate so much are not afraid of telling you when you have reactionary views and how dumb they are, if you want someone banned for being mean to you then go to beehaw, it is against their rules to say anything that doesn’t coddle you.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoPCGaming@lemmy.world•Fallout 4 is a great game with big flaws
    1·
    1 month ago

    With Skyrim modding, I always felt that the mods are somewhat disjointed and it takes skilled modders to stitch together. Here in FO4 its impressive how stable the pack was and how well the quests worked together.

    I modded a lot of Skyrim and I just don’t understand this part. Modlists by other people are very stable, I’ve never had a problem with Wabbajack or lists with just written guides like lexy or phoenix. I’ve made my own lists and I am not a skilled modder, I just read the descriptions of the mods I was downloading and recent comments.

    I didn’t mod fallout 4 very much besides appearance mods and settlement mods. I liked building settlements. But I hated the ending. Ugh. I replayed Skyrim a bunch with and without mods but not fallout 4 because of the ending.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoFediLore + Fedidrama@lemmy.ca•!vegan@lemmy.world mod suppresses criticisms of fediverse spam campaign, using mass ban technique to silence opposing viewpoints
    24·
    2 months ago

    Well it gets fatiguing to debate all the time, especially when some people are just trolling. But you can ask questions like what do you do for protein, B12, iron, etc. without debating. What are some staples that vegans eat, is it easy to make vegan food, how expensive is vegan food, what does a balanced vegan meal look like, what are some recipes, etc. Even asking can a person thrive on a vegan diet through all stages of life and you’ll probably be given an article or recommended to watch Game Changers.

    I think they want to stop the antagonistic people, especially if all they want to do is say: it is only natural to eat meat/we evolved to eat meat, humans have dominion over animals, animals don’t have feelings, vegans are just being overemotional aka only logical people eat meat, it is ok to kill animals, killing animals in factory farms is ok because it is efficient, there isn’t enough land to grow vegan food for everyone, etc. Just shit that’s been responded to a million times and at this point seems bad faith since it’s been debunked before. Maybe they could have a sticky or wiki about these common arguments, idk I am not a mod.

    It also matters what your tone is and that can be the difference between someone asking questions in good faith vs someone doing an antagonistic debate. But yeah at this point vegans do not need to question their values or opinions when it comes to their diet and lifestyle. You cannot convince a vegan it is ok to kill an animal for food but you might be able to convince a non-vegan it is wrong to kill an animal for food. Anyway that was just my thoughts on it.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoFediLore + Fedidrama@lemmy.ca•!vegan@lemmy.world mod suppresses criticisms of fediverse spam campaign, using mass ban technique to silence opposing viewpoints
    4·
    2 months ago

    Thank you for posting this. I know now that it was because of voting which is ehh not as bad as I thought. But yeah IRL my family and partner aren’t very supportive, I’ve been trying to ignore their comments. It’s just hard sometimes, like just last night my partner said they felt sorry for me during dinner because I didn’t have meat in my meal. I think that’s probably why some vegans become more aggressive online as well as the cycle going on. Idk I just like reading articles and seeing recipes. When I first went vegan my dad tried getting my whole family to convince me to eat meat again. I love my dad but that sucked. I also love my partner and they are otherwise fine, but they seem to have a problem and are adjusting to my new diet. I can understand the fatigue a vegan may go through, but banning people for voting isn’t exactly what I had in mind as their rule 5.