Agreed, the headline makes it sound like he’s trying to protect Trump, the article (as far as I am making sense of it) is saying he will take him to court, but not because Biden asked him to.
Agreed, the headline makes it sound like he’s trying to protect Trump, the article (as far as I am making sense of it) is saying he will take him to court, but not because Biden asked him to.
I mean, I know the pandemic felt super long, but 5 years is not exactly what I would call ages.
I can understand woth this information companies wanting to charge more, but I feel like standards need to be higher and refunds guaranteed. They can’t ask us to spend 100’s of dollars on half-complete, buggy messes of games AND also want to charge for DLC and have micro-transactions.
Was there even any short-term gain this time? Next company to try this will probably give much less notice if legally allowed.
That is a great argument for knock-off movies and shitty licensed games because they’re cheap. You’d have to be living a pretty comfortable life to cluelessly buy a console.
A child’s… game? Kids often at school or sleep overs will spread and test the rumor of summoning Bloody Mary. In a dark room, while looking at your reflection, you say “Bloody Mary,” three times.
The low light of the room and the human brain’s tendency to use short cuts makes your eyes perceive a distorted reflection of yourself after you stare at the reflection for a while.
The wizarding game upsets me. I grew up with that series and it is literally a game I would have loved to play as a kid, but I don’t want to support the TERF. Low-key hoping it comes to ps+ so I can get it without giving them money.
An what?
AN WHAT!?
To the Trump’s committing crimes is as natural as breathing, it may not be that easy.
I mean, it also makes sense numbers wise. Republicans still need to pick their guy, democrats literally have one person to give money to.