Hello, as the moderator of said forum i’d like to know what was bad-faith behaviour and repeated hateful content, and why this wasn’t brought up to the moderators of our forum by the administrators of this site before a removal of our forum. Thank you.

Seems like the jewish question is like a red flag to a bull when it comes to liberals.

Not based (alone), but zionism certainly is a part of nazism. Zionism as an ideology claims that jews constitute a nation, this is the basis of zionism. Nazis are zionists in the sense that they also claim that jews constitute a nation, but nazis advocate for the destruction and enslavement of this “nation”, while zionists believe in the supremacy of this “nation”. It is no coincidence that the nazis aided in the creation of Israel.

How was it? The whole ideology is based on zionism and denying the existance of nations in general (aryan “nation” before the actual german nation), not to mention their chauvinism and imperialism, which are incompatable with nationalism.

National socialism was neither nationalist nor socialist.

Ah i see you just replaced “real source” with “reputable source” when pressed on the issue, quite circular logic. What is a “real source”, well a reputable one of course, what is a reputable source? Well a real one of course!

You have no argument and thus resort to a pathetic argument from authority, if something doesn’t come from the mainstream media, then it is “the lowest tier of source”.

Let me guess, “real sources” come exclusively from the imperialist bourgeoise and their lackeys?

Death penalty through crucifiction should be implemented in these cases.

Is there a specific part of the article you object?

It is a teacher who got fired for bogus reasons in this case, i’d say he was the one oppressed.

Ah the famous Ukrainian black army, the one that managed to exist for a whole year before instantly getting destroyed by imperialists, real success story.

As for black panthers, they weren’t even anarchists, not that the lgbt-ideology was a big part of the movement anyway, only towards the end and degeneratation of the movement towards an assimilationist non-revolutionary movement.

Lmao, tell me, how many queer anarchist revolutions have there been?

Adding to that, what proletariat has been liberated by them?

That certainly would be a better alternative to the “rules based order” where only the US is allowed to have nukes.

Two concepts that go hand in hand, queer and anarchism, both manifestations of radical liberal individualism.

6 year olds definetly don’t watch porn or masturbate, if this is something that was done to you, you should definetly have therapy. If you’re witnessing this happening to some kid, call the cops.

Tell me, do you take bourgeois economists who’ve “disproven marxism” seriously?

From being around plenty of childeren. Some of them can start doing it at a very young age just because it feels nice, not from seeing it or understanding it, just from being human and having genitals.

This is an anecdote, i might as well reply with my own anecdote of not seeing such behaviour, both carry as much weight. If one is to base education of children on this notion, there needs to be a study to prove it.

But wouldn’t it be nice if the fate of a child would have more then one support system? Like if the parents are bad maybe the school system can help the child…

Yes and thats the whole point of this post, to criticise the bourgeois education system. Seems to me that you’ve interpreted my critique of the bourgeois education system as demanding there to be no sex education to begin with. Of course there needs to be sex education, but based on materialism and collectivism, ie. marxism. Just look at socialist states for inspiration, like the DPRK. “Sex education” in the imperialist West is based on an individualist ideal of sex only existing for pleasure, with procreation merely as an option, when a marxist recognizes the primary function of sex as procreation, with pleasure merely existing to encourage this. There are then other conclusions that are drawn from whichever view one has, mainly having to do with relationships.

Yes, and schools, “it takes a village” plus parents are not as qualified as teachers sometimes, so it should also be taught at schools.

I wouldn’t trust the bourgeois education system in this.

No, porn is bad, even for adults (for the most part) we should teach about why it is bad but just pretending it does not exist until you are 18 is counter-productive.

Never did i advocate for pretending like it doesn’t exist. If one is to educate the harmfull, degenerate nature of porn, they obviously will have to explain that it exists in the first place. The current bourgeois education system (criticised in the article) on the other hand seeks to normalise porn and exposure of children to it.

What? How should i call it if a child is literaly plaing with thier sex organ for pleasure?

Tell me, where does the notion that children play with their genitals for the purpose of pleasure come from?

Sure tell that to all of the pregnant teens from religous homes and children raped by their parents, I’m sure they will agree with you that this is the solution.

I dont see how this is relevant in any way. This is the product of failed parents.

Porn addicts coming in force here.

I dont condone pedophilia?